Skip to main content

Fermi paradox: firstborn takes all: the thoughts about the war between worlds.




Above this text is a SciFi art that portrays the interstellar war. So could the firstborn take all the reason for this kind of behavior between hypothetical intelligent space races? 

The idea of this version of the Fermi paradox is that every single planet has space for only one intelligent race. The origin of this theory is that young intelligent species and young civilizations cannot accept other intelligent species. And that causes the war between species. So those intelligent species try to destroy each other because they cannot accept competitors. 

When we are looking at human evolution, there is one remarkable thing. When a new member is born in the human evolution its predecessor is lost. So is it possible that this thing can happen on a galactic scale? Could the firstborn civilization destroy all other civilizations? The thing is that ability and will are not the same thing. 

And if some civilization destroys all its competitors that might cause this kind of civilization falls into internal conflict. The destruction of other civilizations requires weapons and then there is always somebody who wants to use those weapons to boost its position. We can think that the civilization that attacks other civilizations cannot hear criticism. And that thing might be visible throughout the entire society. 

The authoritarian dictators are controlling those civilizations. When the outside enemies are gone there is sooner or later an internal fight for power or civil war. If the hypothetical civilization would reach the multi-stellar level there is the possibility that the war between worlds starts between the central world and its colonies. 



There is a couple of things that the interstellar civilization must-have. Before it can destroy its competitors on a galactic level. 


1) It must have the ability to interstellar travel

2) Another civilization must be close enough

3) The civilization must not accept other civilizations. 

4)The civilization must have the will to destroy other civilizations. 

5) The civilization must be immature and thoughtless. The actions like destroying other civilizations cause fear. And that thing can have internal problems in that kind of civilization. 

The war between the stars doesn't mean the war between civilizations or war between races. It can mean a war between the capital of the hypothetical civilization and its colonies. 


The thing is that those three things are the thing that fights against this "firstborn takes all theory".  


During the SETI program is made the profile of civilizations that would make aggressive contact. And the thing is that the sad thing is this. The most aggressive civilizations are young civilizations. That just created their first interstellar systems. 

Those civilizations are believing their force. And they are in a sense of strength. But there is only little possibility that the civilization that just made its first interstellar spacecraft will even face another civilization. There could be about 39 intelligent civilizations in our galaxy. But the distance between those civilizations would be enormous. 


But if the civilization that just made its first interstellar spacecraft faces the primitive species temptation may become too great. And that civilization can make a massacre. 


For creating interstellar technology, the civilization must solve its internal problems. Interstellar projects require very large-scale investments. And even if the civilization doesn't use money. There is needed lots of resources and a workforce. 

There is the possibility that the other civilizations would not be close enough. So the civilization must make advanced interstellar technology for reaching another civilization. And that means the civilization must be mature enough for making that type of contact.


And that means that at least another part of the hypothetical interstellar conflict should be a multi-stellar civilization. 


But when we are thinking about the war between multi-stellar civilizations we must realize how dangerous those wars are. There is the possibility that even another civilization will win and destroy the other. There are always some outposts that are creating new forces and then they might attack the winner. 

The thing is that even the planets are hostile to lifeforms that we know. We must realize that technically advanced civilizations can live on almost every kind of rocky planet. They can create underground tunnels. And underwater stations.

Even if red dwarfs are not allowed a good chance. That lifeform can advance on their planets. Technically advanced civilizations can benefit the solar energy from the dayside of locked planets. And the ocean planets also allow using of the power systems that benefit the capillary power. 

Engineers introduced this power source during the oil crisis in the late 1970s. The system is a raft where is the tube. Which other end in the deep sea. The underpressure will pull the water through the generator. The reason why that project was dispanded. Was that some people believed that the water layers in the ocean will mix. And that causes problems for the ecosystems. But that kinds of things are not problems if there are no lifeforms on the planet. 


See also: 

Drake's equation

Fermi Paradox

Human evolution

SETI-program


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Use virtual "perpetual motion machines" and seawater as energy sources.

   Use virtual "perpetual motion machines"  and seawater as energy sources.  The Archimedean screw can offer almost endless energy sources.  "Robert Fludd's 1618 "water screw" perpetual motion machine from a 1660 wood engraving. It is widely credited as the first attempt to describe such a device." (Wikipedia/Perpetual motion) The term "virtual perpetual motion machine" means a machine. That pulls water to the upper tank using a capillary tube. Then that water will fall through the generator or turbine wheel. The machine uses differences in pressure levels. But it looks like a "perpetual motion machine", that is impossible because of laws of thermodynamics.  The machine uses differences in pressure levels. But it looks like a " real perpetual motion machine", which is impossible because of the laws of thermodynamics.  The real perpetual motion machines don't use outside energy. And that's why they are not possible.

Metamaterials can change their properties in an electric- or electro-optical field.

"Researchers have created a novel metamaterial that can dynamically tune its shape and properties in real-time, offering unprecedented adaptability for applications in robotics and smart materials. This development bridges the gap between current materials and the adaptability seen in nature, paving the way for the future of adaptive technologies. Credit: UNIST" (ScitechDaily, Metamaterial Magic: Scientists Develop New Material That Can Dynamically Tune Its Shape and Mechanical Properties in Real-Time) Metamaterials can change their properties in an electric- or electro-optical field.  An electro-optical activator can also be an IR state, which means. The metamorphosis in the material can thermally activate.  AI is the ultimate tool for metamaterial research. Metamaterials are nanotechnical- or quantum technical tools that can change their properties, like reflection or state from solid to liquid when the electric or optical effect hits that material. The metamaterial can cru

There might be an answer to why there is a gravitational hole in Earth's gravitational field.

The gravitational field at the point of the Indian Ocean is weaker than in other places on Earth. The existence of that gravitational hole is proved. But the reason why that gravitational hole is formed is unknown. The reason why the gravitational field on the Indian Ocean is weaker might be a simple thing.  There is a possible lighter rock in the mantle, or there is less material at that point. In some wildest theories, there are bubbles in magma that turn below the bottom of the Indian Ocean are less massive than in other places on Earth. The lighter material at that point should make the hole in gravitation.  "Geoid undulation in false color. (International Centre for Global Earth Models/Wikimedia, CC BY 4.0) The impact of the ancient planet. In the time when Earth was young. Cause asymmetry of Earth's gravitational field, because there still is the debris of that impact. But the hole in a gravitational field is harder to explain than regular-looking asymmetry.  Could the r