The first flying car, what people really can buy.

(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is the very good advantage for flying cars and for the first time, normal people can buy this kind of vehicle. The major problem with those cheap airborne vehicles is about legislative. The person, who wants to fly those vehicles must have flier's license, what is a quite expensive investment. But those flying cars might take the price of that thing down, but when we are thinking about those cheap airborne vehicles, the technology, what is used in them, have been in use about 20 years. And the term "flying car" means V/STOL (Vertical/ Short Take-Off and Landing) aircraft, that can be as easy to buy like automobiles.


Some of that equipment would drive on the road like automobiles. But there is a couple of problems with those vehicles, and one of those problems is that they can be used to replace combat helicopters in some conflicts. And if somebody makes the decision to equip those vehicles with machine guns, would the result be deadly, and many so-called "third world nations"  might have thoughts, that those "flying cars" could be used in military missions. Those vehicles can use advanced autopilots, and GPS equipment, but if the autopilot would be cut or get malfunctions, would that cause the situation, where the pilot might need to take control, and if the flight skills not found, would results be catastrophic.


Those advanced autopilots and flight control computers use cameras, GPS and GSM-data to communicate with computer centers, what can control the traffic in the air, but if the system would get the malfunction, the flying car can turn dangerous, and if it hits some airplane, the result would be devastating. But flying cars can be used also as replacers of cranes in building sites and those air vehicles could also replace helicopters in many missions, and if they are equipped with the group convention, can they work as a group, that means they can rise very heavy elements from the ground. And this means that they are not toys for some rich people.

Sources:

https://www.facebook.com/cnet/videos/379647522504124/

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/07/flying-car-ready-to-buy-unveiled-at-geneva-motor-show.html

Picture I

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/03/07/105049981-4ED3-REQ-FlyingCar-030718.600x400.jpg?v=1520439303

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Making analyze of technical advantages in aviation

F-36 Interceptor
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/making-analyze-of-technical-advantages.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Next writing is pure hypothetical, and there is full of presumptions. When we are talking about information, what is given about military equipment, we must think also many more things that only the written details. Many times there are more important things, in the parts, what is not purely. The thing what should notice, when somebody writes or tells about AREA-51 or some equipment, what is classified as "Top Secret", is that who would use it, or where it should fly.


This might feels boring, but if some military aircraft home base is AREA-51, and it would fly every mission from that base, would that mean something. When we are talking about military aircraft or any other weapons, we must notice that those equipment need support bases and support equipment. And if we are thinking about the top aircraft in the world like SR-71 "Blackbird" we might guess, why those flights were so expensive to fly.


Same reason might cause the reason, why also B-2 "Spirit" bombers are so expensive. Those aircraft are unique pieces, and that's why they need many unique parts, and probably even the chemical mixture of those aircraft fuels is unique. That makes them very expensive. Also if there would be problems in the mission, those aircraft need support crew, what would handle those planes in the case of accidents. But when we are talking about top military equipment, we must know, that there must be systems, what can abort the mission, if that plane or it's pilot would starting to act unexpected way.


And one of the questions is that if some naval aircraft have the capacity to use hydrogen as a fuel, that gives the unlimited capacity to operate those planes from aircraft carriers. Nuclear powered aircraft carriers have the capacity to make hydrogen by using electrolysis in the chamber, and if there would be aircraft, what have the capacity to use hydrogen in its jet motors, that aircraft would not have limits for its operations. That means the task force doesn't need oil supply for aircraft. and that would also make those aircraft carriers safer because they can make the fuel only when they need it.


The hydrogen what is produced by electrolysis would not end like hydrocarbons, and if we want to be clever, we might equip those aircraft also with oxygen tanks, what means that they would rise very high altitude. If those jet-fighters would use oxygenation in their jet motors, they can rise to the orbital trajectory.


If we are thinking about the controlling those aircraft, they might equip with control layers, what is installed in the jettison. Those layers would turn the exhaust gas and allows those aircraft to maneuver outside from atmosphere. This could be the future military aircraft, what can operate in and out of the atmosphere, and that thing has also capacity to destroy satellites by using missiles or laser weapons. Those aircraft or space shuttles can also use EMP-weapons to destroy the satellites electronic equipment when the satellite would look like undamaged, but it's electronics are destroyed.


That would be the catastrophic situation if that happens to "sleeping" satellite, what is sent to space for use in wartime. The EMP makes the situation possible, where those satellites don't wake up, or in the worst scenario somebody might replace the electronic equipment of the satellite by another one using spacewalk, and then that satellite might send the opponent's headquarters position to the weapons. In the worst scenario opponents, the military commander would shoot missiles in their own headquarters. But this is only the hypothetical situation and there is no proof that this kind of things has been done.

Sources:

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/F-35A_flight_%28cropped%29.jpg/1200px-F-35A_flight_%28cropped%29.jpg 

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/making-analyze-of-technical-advantages.html

Technical remote view (Real life version of the theme: "I have the microphone in my teeth")

Poster for "Alien intelligence" exhibition
in the  museum of modern art Kiasma
2000
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is very well known psychiatric disorder, where the patient thinks that this person has the microphone on their teeth. That syndrome and claiming have the real background, because military intelligence has used the modified hearing aids, what are connected to GSM-phones and Internet. They allow the support team to follow discussions by remote positions. One of the biggest problems with modern wireless prosthetics like eye-prosthesis and hearing aids is that that equipment can use also as spying tools.


Those techniques are developing the company known as PSI-Tech corporation. There would also develop tools, what are bases the brain core stimulation, and that means, the all conscious of the human or another animal can transfer to human brains. Ability to send animals EEG-to humans would give the new way to see how nature works. Also, humans could send a day as an animal if they wanted. And this is the way to make real-life Tarzan, who communicates with animals. Also, those implants would use to control the animals, what makes them extremely dangerous.


There are many more ways to eavesdrop another person and I have read from somewhere, that in the skulls of the dangerous criminals have implanted eavesdrop equipment.  Also, eye prosthesis can transform as the remote view equipment. There are many ways to make eye-prosthetic, and one is just connecting the action camera with EEG-machine, what stimulates the vision center in human brains. The same waves what makes visual effects in the brains can transmit by GSM-telephone and Internet to another side of the world, by using standard communication satellites. That would give the opportunity to see everything, what the targeted person sees.


To the brains or the brain, the core can install the electrodes, what communicates with those EEG-systems wireless thru the skull. In this version inside the skull, over the dura mater will put the net, where are the electrodes, what gives stimulation to the brain core, and that system would give electric power from similar plutonium batteries that are used in pacemakers. And they can be useful also in internal prosthetic.


Those systems could be actually normal WEB-cameras, what is installed in the eye sockets, and they can communicate with that net by using BlueTooth communication protocol. The problem with that implanted prosthesis is that they must get safe and long-term batteries for their working. And because there must not make fixed injuries on the skin, those wireless equipment are very safe, and they would not infect the patient.


And the plutonium batteries are problematic in that use because they contain highly radioactive material. The solution might that the eye prosthesis would equip with standard batteries, and they can be recharged by using the wireless battery charger. That means that the person must only sleep on the side of that mobile telephone charger, and that would recharge those batteries. That would make easier to use this kind of solutions, and wireless technology will make them safer. But the problem is that those systems can be hacked and used as the spying tool.

Sources:

http://www.psitech.net/

Picture 1:

http://www.antikvaari.fi/imagesproduct/1179_outo%C3%A4ly_2014114105932.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/technical-remote-view-real-life-version.html

How to make the artificial amoeba or Medusa? And why somebody wants to do that thing?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-to-make-artificial-amoeba-or-medusa.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-to-make-artificial-amoeba-or-medusa.html