Open information can be the biggest threat to freedom of speech

NORAD at 80's
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/open-information-can-be-biggest-threat.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is coming new movie about the book named "Fahrenheit 451", and that movie is more actual than ever before. Nowadays technology would allow us filter and manipulate the information unlimited way. And this is the most dangerous thing in the world. The information manipulation, what is targeted to military systems can cause the nuclear war. And this makes the information manipulation so dangerous, or what do you think about the situation, that somebody would put to the NORAD's (North American Air Defense Command)  screens film of the missile attack.


Then the nuclear war and global destruction of the human civilization would knock to the door. In this scenario, hackers would take control the screen of Cheyenne mountain, and that situation causes the launching of the missiles. Above the text, you might see one of the biggest paradox in the information technology. The paradox is that open information would be the biggest threat to freedom of speech. This means that the open information can be used by the way, what increases will of censorship. And this is the very sad thing because the freedom of speech is the key element in the real democracy.


But there is a problem in democracy, and they are persons, who missuses Internet for delivering anger and hate against other people. This kind of action would be delivering violent material or stimulate people to start violent actions against some people, who are against their opinions, and in some cases would the freedom of information allowed, if it supports the leading class people way to see things.


Filtering and changing the things is one of the most dangerous ways to control the information. The law would prohibit the censorship and in theory, the information would be free, but it would be censored or transform by the leading class. This is called as the "hidden censorship". This method means, that there is a couple of service offers for the Internet, and the state or some group of leading party would actually own the companies, what offer data services in the country. The censorship can be explained to the people that filtered information contained only the child pornography, what is of course against ethics of most common people, but when we are thinking the filtering of unwanted information, there could happen those things with legal homepages, what contains uncomfortable information about as an example of the political leaders relationship with the financial world.


After that, the political censorship would be possible, and nobody even knows what happens behind the walls of some telecommunication companies. This means that there is freedom to deliver information, what is supported the leaders of the telecommunication companies, but if the information doesn't serve them, the result would be, that the information would be disturbed by cutting the net in the middle of writing or sending photographs.


And also the homepages would be banned because they are revolting against copyrights. In this hypothesis, the telecommunication companies are the tool to control the state. In this case, the person, who controls the information, controls the nation. Those companies are the best tool for erasing uncomfortable information from the net, and in the worst scenarios the original information would be replaced by other texts or films, and this can be used to get political refugees return to the countries, where they left. There could deliver the false information about the crimes, what that person have made. And there could be faked and manipulated photos, where this person would sit in the front of drugs, and that would give an excuse to deliver that man or woman to that country, what that person has left behind.


This is one scenario, what might be interested some persons in the head of the national security.  Another way is to replace the home page with another one, what is full of weapons and stimulating for political violence. That kind of violence can make censorship possible. In some scenarios, those homepages can use subliminal flashing photos and infrasound commands to activate violent behavior. And that kind of systems might be used for some activists. When those usually young persons have stimulated to violence, that violation can be used to excuse for massive police actions against them.


In some rumors, the pilots, who flew the planes, what strike to World Trade Center and Pentagon were targeted this kind of messages. Those messages could be installed on airplanes by using USB stick, and program, what would deliver those messages by using aircraft loudspeaker- and the computerized avionics. And the meters would start to deliver those flash pictures, what are prohibited in normal marketing. Those techniques were developed for MKULTRA and PHOENIX-programs. And they were effective against enemies. So if those techniques would be programmed to some computer, would it become more dangerous than any tool before.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program

Picture I

https://fsmedia.imgix.net/0b/f1/84/2b/9478/40fb/9b86/5e618413338a/norads-command-center-in-all-its-eighties-glory.jpeg?rect=0%2C0%2C1600%2C800&auto=format%2Ccompress&w=650

About the secrecy and security in the Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The collecting information of users of social media is not new in the world. This thing has been the problem all the time, and now it has been coming to publicity. When somebody doesn’t give information to the social media, would that be also information, what profilers use, then they make psychological profiles about targeted persons. If somebody doesn’t use social media, there is no question, does this person want to use social media. It is the question, that the profiler sees, that the person hides something.


Social media is so common thing, that if somebody wants to be outside those services, must this person have the good reason for that. And when we are talking about profiles, the needed information can be collected from somewhere else than Facebook or Twitter. Profiling the people is not the new thing in police or military intelligence. The use of telephone, and the things, what person buys and what kind of hobbies person has gives also information, what profiler use.


The phone calls to sex phones would tell very much about person’s sexual behavior, and collecting that kind of information is denied by law. But the problem is that those so-called “phone boxes” is a telephone number and if somebody got the list of phone calls, and the length of those phones, can this sneaker get information, what would cause damage for other person’s reputation.


People would give information about themselves in many ways. One is to take pictures from own apartment, and sometimes there are the things, what doesn’t look very good. Or if some lonely man would buy women underwear simultaneous, that would make the increasing of interest of profiler. The profiles of YouTube usages would give the information, what attracts us, and what is disgusting for us.


The use this information in PSYOPS and INFO-OPS is the very attractive thing. That information is important when the right persons would be tempted to look music videos, where has been used subliminal messages like flash pictures and infrasound messages. But if the person doesn’t use social media, would that cause the situation, where this person would be started to followed more intensive methods that social media.

The reason for intensive surveillance would be, that the person is hiding something. And that would cause the interest of eavesdrop that person. When the people are profiled, the filtering of information is easy, and the profile would help to find the persons who have something to hide.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-secrecy-and-security-in-internet.html

Subliminal command systems and the risks of using those systems on the battlefield.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/subliminal-command-systems-and-risks-of.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/subliminal-command-systems-and-risks-of.html

The use of social media as the psychological warfare platform

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-use-of-social-media-as.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-use-of-social-media-as.html

Why newspapermen are wanted co-operatives for the CIA?

Is this UVB-76 "Buzzer", what has been operated over
30 years non-stop, sending the
same message again and again?
(Source Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Today was list on the net, where was listed people who worked for CIA. The second name was a very influential newspaperman, who owned many medias. Do you know why CIA wants to make deals with those people? They want to publish platform for highly professional PSY-OP or information warfare stuff. CIA uses normal newspaper and electric media for publishing that very effective material on the Internet.

That makes that information warfare or propaganda-material more believable when it comes from the normal commercial network, and of course, the thing that makes that fake media believable is virtual citric against CIA and its partners. Those things what makes propaganda more believable are so-called "leaks" from the government. That "leaked" information will make texts and videos more interesting.


The first key element of information operation is to make the text easy to read and films must be that kind of material, what is not hard for the psyche. That's why propaganda is a very dangerous weapon in hands of professionals, who might have marketing, psychiatric and network education, and those people think what is their target group for propaganda or psychological operations. So the mission of those men and women is to weaponize the net. They make their job for motivating soldiers and civilians to stand in one front behind troops mission. Propaganda- or psychological operations are very simple.


The operators must just rise in soldiers minds a think why they must fight. And as one of the greatest soldier of history, Napoleon Bonaparte said: "who owns soldiers mind owns the army".  And that's why propaganda must be one thing, what must take a part of military and civilian training. Propaganda is always near ordinary people, and social media gives the opportunity to target propaganda for single persons of the state. But when military men at front listen enemy radio-stations. they would be a target for subliminal messages that are put in some music files, and that kind of propaganda is very effective. The most feared situation will be like those, where some military pilots are targeted by subliminal messages.


That kind of propaganda will make possible that even nuclear carrying aircraft will jump over to other nations. Another hand nuclear submarine USS Jimmy Carter has subliminal information transmit system on board, and that will make theoretically possible to give launching order to some Russian or Chinese nuclear submarines. That kind of systems is very lethal if they go in wrong hand.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/