How to make own words more influential?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

All of us want to be heard in the meetings and conferences, but how we can make our words influential? How to be sure, that other people would listen to those words, and they would support our opinions? If we are younger employees, we might have difficulties with that problem. How to make elder workers listen to our words? The most effective way to make power to our words is claimed, that the idea comes from the customers or some other actor.


That would give a picture or thought, that the idea is coming from somebody else. In this case, we must remember, that the persons, who we want to influent, might check that thing. They might ask, have somebody really said that thing, and that would be little embarrassing if that customer etc. will not remember that thing. Another way to make an influence is to claim, that some great scientist has said the things, what we are bringing in the discussion.


This is the way, what some persons are using in university. They would copy the ideas of great scientists and then put source under their texts. This shows that those persons can read the ideas, what somebody have brought in the own discussions maybe a hundred years ago.  When we are meeting that kind of person, they might be really vexatious. They always start their speech with the words "the great scientist said once", and this makes those persons look like a little bit silly because we all can lend that book from the library, and see those pearls of wisdom from there.


In this case, we have a problem. We should say something, what those persons, who have written everything about those things cannot find in books. We must bring something new to that table. And that is really difficult. The most difficult thing in the world is to show something really new, what comes from our own brains. Also, people should have to make listen to those ideas and the comments should take very seriously. When we are at meetings, we should put our mobile telephones away, and listen to the things, what other people say.


And in those meetings, we should be active, and write the ideas or some other interesting things on paper. And after the meeting, we can write those texts with the text editor. This shows that the person is active, and interesting about the things, what are under the handling. And in the meetings, we should follow, what other people say, but everybody is sometimes "sleeping", and when the boss asks something, is two ways to act.


Other is to say something, and hope that the answer would be even near the thing, what question handles. Or the other way is to say, "sorry, but can you repeat your question". Think about which one is better? And the third is to say, "I have nothing to say". But in this case, we should be careful, because if those words are involved in the thing, what we should do, there would be very embarrassing situations. So the best way is to confess, that we are not perfect, and ask, what the boss said. This would spend time and money.

Who takes a part in other countries internal politics?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/2018/07/who-takes-part-in-other-countries.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The great point of meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump is closing, and here is one very interesting notification about this meeting, and about criticising those leaders. The thing is, that Trump is prosecuted by taking a part in the United Kingdoms internal politics because he said something about it. But meanwhile, the Russian military personnel are charged with hacking the computers in the election process of the United States president.


And this is a very bad thing because hacking of those computers can influent the result of the election. This is the very interesting thing because if some intelligence service would want to influent the election of other states leaders, that is taking part in internal politics of that country. When we are talking about how those leaders would be dealing with media, we are noticing that is a difference about attitudes, what is tolerated by those leaders. Everything, what Putin makes is right, but when Trump says something, he makes everything wrong.


There is something that makes Russian intelligence operations more acceptable than United States intelligence operations. And I must say that this is the very interesting attitude. By the way, the term "intelligence operation" means actually the getting information. The hacking of the computers and influence the internal politics of some other land is "covert action", or "Black Operation". And when we are thinking about the situation, that Russian intelligence officers have made the influential action in the election campaign, that would happen by order of Kreml or somebody else, and this kind of actions can be marked that every connection to the head of the state would deny.


That means that the persons, who might be behind that action are covered. Maybe Putin knew that or maybe he didn't know about those hackings. But there are also other people, who might claim that Putin was involved because that would slow the investigations. This hacking brought some thoughts to my mind. One of them is "how many times this has made before?". I think that those persons, who are behind that operation might not be first-timers for making that kind of things. And how many times that kind of influence has been given to the election campaigns in the small countries, what would not be so loudly to protect their benefits? So is there other nations, where is made this kind of hacking operations, where the election of the head of the state has been influenced by cyber operations, what are made by the foreign actor?


One part of information operations is that the enemy would tell that the resistance would be doomed even before the war have begun. The opponent is trying to metalize the targeted nations, that they would not have any change in the real military conflict. And after that, the "wise men" would lay down their weapons and start to take a spoon in their beautiful hand, and start to follow the opponent's orders. There is one thing that information warfare specialists always highlight. That is that "why own military personnel must risk their lives for some other country?". The purpose of this kind of argumentation is to break coalitions and for this kind of action, the single parts of the coalition would give the benefits like free trade contracts if they slip off the front. Fear is one of the best weapons in the word. And if another side would be doomed to lose, that would give change to grow the own position in the international area.

Why is the atheism the necessary point of view in scientific writing?

http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/why-is-atheism-necessary-point-of-view.html
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/why-is-atheism-necessary-point-of-view.html
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/why-is-atheism-necessary-point-of-view.html
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/why-is-atheism-necessary-point-of-view.html
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/why-is-atheism-necessary-point-of-view.html
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/why-is-atheism-necessary-point-of-view.html

Philosophers are always professional thinkers

Philosopher Sokrates
(Picture I)

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/philosophers-are-always-professional.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The thinking is a good way to show the existence of the thinker self, and thinking about things makes days better. But if we want to know about the thoughts, and get feedback are they good or bad, those thoughts can be published. If the person has thoughts, what is somehow bad, that can be told to other people. Otherwise, they might see the philosopher as the person, who lays on the sofa and writes something with the laptop computer. This action is called the modeling of the thinking process, and it's very important part of the day of the philosopher, who seems to do nothing.


Doing something is the key element to making people suitable for the social group of the normal citizens. his is the reason, why philosopher wants to think every single thing in the world. The reason, why some people think that thinking is somehow a bad thing, is sometimes so shy, that they believe, that their opinions are making somebody laugh. But in the world, we must understand that there are not bad opinions, there are only opinions.


And opinion is one way to think. Today I read from the media, that Finnish minister of defense told that civilians should not involve the chose of the next fighter- or multirole system, what the Air Force would choose. Here I must say that statement is somehow the little bit interesting, because if some writings or opinions are meant nothing, why they should be commented by using very strong arguments?


 If somebody writes something unprofessional in the net, who cares about them? There are many texts in the world, where is not head or tail, and there would be no comments about them. If somebody writes, that Ferrari is better than Lamborghini, we ever ask have this kind of writer ever driven each of those cars. So why some fighters cause very strong argumentation?


The thinking is the key to existence, and publicising those texts is the way to tell to other persons, that the writer exists. That is the problem with existence. René Descartes wrote and published his texts because he wanted to be somebody for other people. And I think that this man was cursed, that maybe his friends ever listened what he said. There are many people, who think, that they want to be like Descartes, but there is one thing, what differentiates this kind persons from normal people.


This is the things, what they want to say and share with other people. Normal people would not sometimes want to listen to the thoughts of thinking and existence, even they are told about the great philosophers like René Descartes. That is the reason, why Descartes wrote the texts to some statements. Philosophers are professional thinkers, who believe, that everybody must have the chance to read their texts and thoughts.



But if they are not interested, would the reading be voluntary made action, and that time the man can spend as an example of snow cleaning. Descartes had right to tell others his opinions, and he had right to expect that somebody would listen to his worlds. Then he started to write those texts because texts are visible to everyone. And they could read in the noisy environment. That has brought much incredible wisdom in the eyes of humans, who enjoy reading those persons like Descartes thoughts in the home or library.

Picture I


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/33/d6/28/33d628b3f97cee65677e7fa4301a3104--classical-period-su.jpg

There is no text, what have no influence, and imagination is the key to making interesting text

Kimmo Huosionmaa

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/there-is-no-text-what-have-no-influence_13.html

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

Many people think that there are harmless texts in the world. Some of the most harmless texts are mentioned being science fiction stories. Those texts are mentioned to be coming straight from the writer's imagination. But the persons who tell that are always forgotten, that every single invention in the world is the reason for the imagination of the inventor. We don't want to believe any secret experiments or eugenics. But when we are thinking that somebody wants to make "super humans" might this person want to destroy weak genomes from the individuals. The most suitable way to make that is use radioactive radiation for that purpose.


High level of radiation can use as the scary element, what can keep people out of that area. But there is one possibility for keeping the radiation in high level. And that is cutting the individuals, who have weak genomes from the system. But this kind of things is so-called marginal Sci-Fi what means sometimes horror-style science fiction what means that monsters are creating human experiments. Same style texts are made by some notorious human behavior experiments. The source of those stories is the case, where psychologist named Watson taught the child, that teddy-bears are the frightened creature.


He used loud voice, when this psychologist shows a teddy bear to the child, what was called as "Albert", and that test was made in 1920, and some rumors are that this child was named "Josef", and he became infamous doctor Mengele, the "Angel of Death" of Auschwitz-Birkenau. This experiment was proved that people would make do anything by using this kind of methodology. This horrifying experiment made people think that behind some of the most notorious crimes is the person, who is the victim of that kind of experiments or unqualified medical personnel. The "Case Albert" was brought to my mind one very disturbing idea: what if somebody might make this test by claiming that fear was made by some jew, and could somebody make that kind of experiment to Adolph Hitler?


This could explain his fanatic hate against Jews. The experiments like "Case Albert" were justified in many societies, but it brought the mind of the people one question: what has been done in the institutes, what was in the middle of the forests. We must ask also what those medical experiments made with children who were not met their parents? The horror stories are sometimes written by keeping some areas clean by people, who would not want to see, what was happen in those areas.


One of the most attractive Sci-Fi-horror film what I have seen is "Capricorn one", where NASA hides secret, that it's flight to Mars is happening in the studio. Then the capsule destroyed during the landing, and those persons who were working as the "film stars" become the problem for the men, who are behind this thing. Then those persons made the decision, that those persons must die. And after that, they must hide the killers of the government. The story is actually the copy of the old theory, that NASA  made some moonwalks in a studio.


The original conspiracy theory about faked moon trips was the rumor that only one or two of those moon trips were made in the studio, and another of those capsules were Apollo 13, but there is no evidence of that. The Space suits are very useful in the deep space operations, and they could use in the kilometers deep.  In the claiming of "hoax moonwalk" the site where that operation happened was in the bottom of Ocean. The reason for those "studio flights" have been explained that NASA transferred money for "black budget aircraft projects".


But somebody claims that NASA would tell more lies about the technology, what has been used in their Moon projects. One claim was that in the chamber of rocket motors were installed the electric-dynamic motor, what was series of opposite rotating magnets. That system is actually known as "Die Glocke", or maybe there was electric arc equipment inside the burning chamber. The electric rocket motors like ion rockets would not need nuclear reactors for working. They can equip with generators, what is connected to the pumping system of the rocket, and they can give enough electricity that those rockets can fly in empty space by enormous speed if that would be compiled with the speed what normal rocket can take.


But, in fact, the most childish Sci-Fi writings and cartoons give the fascinating ideas of the things, what seems like real magic. When we are thinking about the situation, that space suit would be covered by magnets, what would accelerate ions over the space suits outer layer, would that allow to make real life "superman suit". But the problem of this is, of course, the electricity, what that acceleration system needs.


When we are thinking the conditions of outer space, the travel between the stars is possible to make by using space suits. In this case, the temperature inside the suit would decrease to the absolute zero point, and in this zero Kelvin degrees, all molecular movements are stopped. In that temperature, the organism would not get older, and if the waking up process is made that the person's body temperature would rise at the speed of degrees per day, and when temperature would rise high enough, would the automatized body functions return begin, by giving that person the electric shocks to heart.


When that "package" would travel to the targeted planet, would the transfer to the surface of planet happen by parachutes. And if there is suitable bacteria could those colonialists live like on the Earth. This is of course pure fiction, because if those bacteria of that planet might be different than our own, would they infect those travelers.  In the zero kelvin degrees would the systems of that miniature spacecraft be in the superconducting shape, and there would the batteries stay forever, because there is no resistance in the electric wires. And in the space is possible to pump electricity to the spacesuit by using high power radio-waves. There is some things what makes those things very attractive for Sci-Fi writers.


In some books the refugees from Earth would go to trajectory of Pluto, and then they would wait that the situation would become restless in that "freezer". And after they are forgotten those refugees would return to the Earth. This is one way to handle writing and books what would bring many good ideas to our mind. Remember that all great inventions are came from the inventors imagination. And the yesterdays Science Fiction is nowadays practical solution.

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/there-is-no-text-what-have-no-influence_13.html

No synthetic shape would create without an influence of architect

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/08/no-synthetic-shape-would-create-without-an-influence-of-architect/

Beware of social media, and remember that everything you see is not true

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about social media and the use of it as the propaganda platform, we must say that modern technology allows making very trustable propaganda in the very low budget. The open source rendering platforms allow to create the animated films, where are characters, what looks absolutely real. Those photorealistic characters are allowed to make the realistic propaganda animation, what cannot separate from real news film.


Also, the use of social media allows making profiles of the persons, what are meant to target for propaganda. That means the propagandists can make propaganda, what is more, attractive and influential for targeted persons than ever before.

Social media is the very good weapon in the hands of propaganda makers because that media can be used in targeted propaganda, what is meant for children of the leaders, who are working for police and military. And of course, also criminal organizations would use social media in their recruiting campaigns, what is targeted to younger members of police and military. In those campaigns, those organizations claim, that they are only victims of the system, and the law enforcement only takes them as the targets of the use of force. And of course, drugs and doping are all right in that propaganda.


But the way to look like social media is that would give the information of the things like actions in some elections. Here I must ask does anybody tell us about the electoral fraud of Russian elections, or would the world be quiet about this kind of things? Silence is the very good way to keep undemocratic forces in power. And social media is also brought many things in publicity, what has been kept in silence.


And when we are talking about censorship, we would not want that thing. Social media has brought the attitude problems of some officials to public knowledge. Also the thing, those undemocratic forces are found also in so-called paradigm democracies. And what we have learned by social media is, that many things, what we are known as the truth, has more aspects than we ever couldn't expect.


The social media has shown that any media is not absolute neutral or all reporters are not standing behind the truth. That kind of reporters have supported the dictatorial governments, and an example the most important supporters of Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler were journalists, who wrote the supporting propaganda for those dictators. They made articles, what justified persecution of political enemies of those dictators. This is an aspect, what we must understand, while we are investigated media.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/beware-of-social-media-and-remember.html

The political terminology and the new era of populism

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-political-terminology-and-new-era.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-political-terminology-and-new-era.html