Philosophers are always professional thinkers

Philosopher Sokrates
(Picture I)

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/philosophers-are-always-professional.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The thinking is a good way to show the existence of the thinker self, and thinking about things makes days better. But if we want to know about the thoughts, and get feedback are they good or bad, those thoughts can be published. If the person has thoughts, what is somehow bad, that can be told to other people. Otherwise, they might see the philosopher as the person, who lays on the sofa and writes something with the laptop computer. This action is called the modeling of the thinking process, and it's very important part of the day of the philosopher, who seems to do nothing.


Doing something is the key element to making people suitable for the social group of the normal citizens. his is the reason, why philosopher wants to think every single thing in the world. The reason, why some people think that thinking is somehow a bad thing, is sometimes so shy, that they believe, that their opinions are making somebody laugh. But in the world, we must understand that there are not bad opinions, there are only opinions.


And opinion is one way to think. Today I read from the media, that Finnish minister of defense told that civilians should not involve the chose of the next fighter- or multirole system, what the Air Force would choose. Here I must say that statement is somehow the little bit interesting, because if some writings or opinions are meant nothing, why they should be commented by using very strong arguments?


 If somebody writes something unprofessional in the net, who cares about them? There are many texts in the world, where is not head or tail, and there would be no comments about them. If somebody writes, that Ferrari is better than Lamborghini, we ever ask have this kind of writer ever driven each of those cars. So why some fighters cause very strong argumentation?


The thinking is the key to existence, and publicising those texts is the way to tell to other persons, that the writer exists. That is the problem with existence. René Descartes wrote and published his texts because he wanted to be somebody for other people. And I think that this man was cursed, that maybe his friends ever listened what he said. There are many people, who think, that they want to be like Descartes, but there is one thing, what differentiates this kind persons from normal people.


This is the things, what they want to say and share with other people. Normal people would not sometimes want to listen to the thoughts of thinking and existence, even they are told about the great philosophers like René Descartes. That is the reason, why Descartes wrote the texts to some statements. Philosophers are professional thinkers, who believe, that everybody must have the chance to read their texts and thoughts.



But if they are not interested, would the reading be voluntary made action, and that time the man can spend as an example of snow cleaning. Descartes had right to tell others his opinions, and he had right to expect that somebody would listen to his worlds. Then he started to write those texts because texts are visible to everyone. And they could read in the noisy environment. That has brought much incredible wisdom in the eyes of humans, who enjoy reading those persons like Descartes thoughts in the home or library.

Picture I


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/33/d6/28/33d628b3f97cee65677e7fa4301a3104--classical-period-su.jpg