New transformers and iron-man robots can be revolutionized.

There are questions about things like can the AI really think? Or does it only mimic some actions? There is a method to teach the computer called macro learning. When a robot or computer faces some situation for the first time the programmer creates a macro or action for that thing. Even if a robot only mimics humans, that robot can follow the controller’s instructions and movements for the first time. Then that robot compares those situations where those things are given to things that it faces. If the situation matches with the situation where the action is connected that activates the action. Or macro. The name: “macro-based programming” means that the programmer creates actions for robots. And then connects that action, or macro to the event. 

The new transformer and Iron Man robots are tools that can change robotics. Those tools are equipped with abilities that allow them to change their shape. Or those robots can fly to places like roofs. That thing makes them good operators for rescue, intelligence, and other types of missions. The man-shaped robot can operate window washers for skyscrapers, or they can pick up interesting things from the ground or roofs. The robot is equipped with jets, but it's possible to use blowers that make them quiet. The new AI-based tools can make those robots more self-learning than we ever imagined. 

Those blowers make it possible for the robot to operate underwater. And that is the thing that makes Iron Man robots interesting tools for deep-sea operations. The man-shaped robot can operate with the same tools as humans. And those robots can transfer themselves from one airplane to another. Or they can jump onto the roofs of aircraft. They might carry versatile sensors. Like seismic microphones in their feet. Those systems allow those robots to hear voices through the roofs. That kind of robot can carry humans out from burning houses. Only imagination limits those systems' capacities.

The ability to transform vehicles from cars to something that flies is an interesting thing. The ability to travel on highways or on the ground is something that makes those systems unseen. That ability allows those systems to move in places where flying machines cannot go. The ability to transform cars into things like quadcopters is the thing that brings interesting ideas. There are projects whose goal is cheap hybrid vehicles that can be called “flying cars”. That means an aerial vehicle whose price is the same as some personal vehicle. 

Those vehicles can move on the road or they can rise airborne. Those systems can be the thing that forces us to re-estimate our security. When we think about burglaries those systems can transport operators to the roof. But those systems can deliver things like drones. They can operate autonomously. The problem is that new anti-tank and other weapons are easy to put into those systems. Many flying cars can reach 400-600 km/h which is faster than any regular helicopter. That means those “flying cars” can transport things like AA missiles. 

New nuclear batteries can work as powerhouses for those robots. They can operate for even years or their operational time can be unlimited. This means those robots can operate on other planets and in their atmosphere. 

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/china-kuickwheel-skyrider-x6-44-7-mph-speed-31-mile-range

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/06/real-life-transformers-are-here-uk-inventor-builds-shape-shifting-robot-that-morphs-into-a-fully-functional-vehicle/. 

https://scitechdaily.com/real-life-iron-man-worlds-first-jet-powered-humanoid-robot-takes-flight/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_(computer_science)

The future of robots might be more interesting than we ever imagine.

Emotional robots can act as nurses. But they can be the next-generation tools for intelligence and law enforcement. The official name for the robot that looks like a human is an android. We could call the human-looking robots "virtual humans". 

Virtual emotions are making robots feel like a human. And the human-like robot can make many things that are impossible for humans. 

The physical robot can act as an external body for its controllers. And in that case, the robot has the same IQ level as its controller. There is the possibility that the robot is hybrid-controlled. In routine missions robot uses autopilot. 

But in special cases, like in a new mission environment. The controller will make the robot for the first time make its mission. The robot records that mission and then it can make the job independently. 

But the AI-controlled robots can use virtual workspaces for making the first-time routine. The problem with physical robots is that they can be dangerous in the wrong hands. The physical, human-looking robot can same weapons as humans. 

And that makes them a little bit dangerous because criminals can make remote-controlled bank robberies by using that kind of system. When we are thinking of things like cleaner robots. Those systems can have the "shadow protocol" that makes them transmit data to third parties. 

Robots, especially AI-controlled robots that can show virtual emotions are incredible machines. Those robots are created for nursery work, but also intelligence, law enforcement, and other security agencies can be interested in human-looking robots with individual nature.  

The robot can have virtual emotions and virtual characters. In those virtual emotional systems, each robot has a different individual style for discussion with people. Different variables can make the robot look angry, sad, or something like that. Every single robot can have different variables that can make it speak louder. 

But when we are thinking about physical robots we are facing one thing. The robot is the physical tool for the AI. And things, like 5G networks allows robot body to connect themselves with computer centers. The robot can have access to the Chat GPT-style artificial intelligence. That makes it able to speak with people. 

Each robot can have different details in its programming. And that thing makes them feel like an individual. 

The robot can feel very realistic. But the fact is that the robot is only the physical part of highly advanced artificial intelligence. When we are thinking about robots, they might look and feel like real humans. But the fact is that they are machines. Those human-looking robots can play chess with real people if they have access chess program. 

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Could somebody activate "ARTICHOKE"-programming by accident?

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the movie "Manchurian candidate" the psychological specialists program the soldier to make assassinations by using simultaneous repeating infrasound, the medicines, and hypnosis. In the elder version, the trigger was the heart queen, and that launched the effect, what caused the assassination. Or it causes the "dance effect", what makes the human, who is targeted for the brainwashing take the gun and shoot the targeted person. And that process is called as "brainwashing". The "dance effect" causes because the trainer teaches the victim the "katas", series of movements, what can be very dangerous. That kind of things are learned in the martial arts like karate, and that makes those self-defense skills so effective.


In the most advanced method would the brainwasher can use also Virtual Reality for making anger in the person's mind. The anger reaction is called as "trigger", and it would make the person act violently against some other person. In the worst scenarios, those psychological operators might play some kind of police or even play the victims own family. In the VR-method the consequence would be lowered by using chemical stimulants, that the victim would not even realize about that suggestion. Also, the feet or arms can be numbed during that thing.


That suggestion method was tested in the "PROJECT ARTICHOKE", and even if those experiments were ended in 1970's somebody might have thought those methods to some private military corporation. In the real world of science, the scientist, who makes the invention can teach that methodology to other persons, who are so-called the field team. In this case, somebody can play some kind of newspaperman or some activist and then ask about the methodology, what was used in ARTICHOKE-program.


The suggestion is the most attractive method when somebody would be wanted to give money to some other person. In this case, the methodology, what have been used in those mind control programs are using in the normal criminal activities. The trigger, what is used to make person murder, might use to suggest other people get the money to somebody else. But in fact, somebody has been targeted for that kind of brainwashing in "PROJECT ARTICHOKE", and if the trigger is the number 666 in the receipt, would the result be very devastating.

Difference between killer- and an industrial robot is only in their programming.

(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the real world, we all want to say "no" to autonomous combat robots, what might be the greatest threat for peace today. The artificial intelligence makes possible to make robots, what are looking innocent, and they can be used in some normal work, but when they would see the targeted object, what have ordered to exterminate those robots would attack that target immediately. In this case let's say as an example the gardener robot would noticed something treating, that robot can be transforming as the combat robot, and maybe in that robot's arms is hired machine guns or laser weapons, and when something, what is ordered to exterminate would come in sight, would the wrist turn down, and uncover the nasty surprise.


This example, what I just gave, is one of the most feared things in the world of robotics. It is known as the "ghost protocol", and that means that normally the peaceful working robot would turn to combat robot, when it notices the target, what is dangerous for it or it masters. When some nation would say "no" to killer robots, they have forgotten that only programming would make difference between peaceful and the killer robot.  And in the real situation, the operators of the robots would just upload combat programs in those working robots by using the Internet. And this means that there is a change, to make the full army of robots in seconds by using industrial robots, what are equipped with those combat programs.


The Russians are always against this kind of programs because they have no experience in building the sophisticated robots, but their way to make new nuclear missiles authorizes Western world to make autonomous killer robots. And this is the problem with robotics, the same machine can do many missions, like working in the mining sites and other dirty and dangerous places. If the robots are made looking like humans, they could use same tools as humans, but in this case "one model fits all" can get the notorious shape because those human-shaped robots can also be used as the warriors because they can operate with normal infantry weapons. And the use of those weapons is needs only the program update, that those robots could transfer as the combat models in one second, by sending those programs by using the Internet.

Sources:

https://futurism.com/germany-pledges-not-killer-robots/

https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2014/08/top-six-strategic-threats-worry-about-todays-global-headlines/92000/

https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/un-told-to-ban-killer-robots-before-they-become-a-reality/

Picture I

https://cdn.defenseone.com/media/img/upload/2014/08/20/shutterstock_190737419/medium.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

The speed of the supercomputer is not alone made ultimate computing.

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Problem with the quantum computer is not only in building the new kind of microchip. Another problem is to create the program or operating system, what can use all power of the supercomputer. And one solution would be used multi-layer kernel, where the top layer is normal Windows or Linux layer, and that layer communicates with processor thru the lower layer, what is specially designed for those ultimate processors.


The speed of microprocessors is not the only thing, what makes the ultimate computing and ability to make the sharp and powerful simulation. Another important thing is that the programs can communicate and control that electric equipment. In the production of microchips might use nanotechnology, what allows to make the three-atom size of transistors. In those transistors, the foot, collector, and emitter are made of the single atom.


And the super fast computers can also cool to the temperature where it turns to superconducting. It would give it ultimate clock frequency because that superconductor would eliminate the heating of the processor. But then the temperature must be near absolute zero-point or zero Kelvin temperature. Those ultra small and fast components need also new kind of kernels.


This means that if the computer programs and kernel, what makes the layer, where computer microchips are communicating with computer software have no ability to drive computer with full speed, or is not otherwise capable to exploit the full power of those computers, the superfast computers are useless. This is one of the greatest problems with the creating the quantum computer.


There are no programs, what can exploit the capacity of this new kind of supercomputer. One version to solve that problem is to make multilayer kernel, where the top layer is normal Windows or Linux kernel, what would control the lower layer of the kernel. This lower layer of the kernel would be made for communicating with that quantum processor. That would be one solution for that ultra-fast computer.


The ultra-fast computers are needed also in everyday computing because mobile solutions use so-called pre-processed computing, where all calculations happen in the server. This allows making the mobile systems, where are the long-term batteries. The mobile computers like tablets are usually quite weak processors. The calculations must do in somewhere, and those process would happen in the memory of central computers. But the servers must have powerful processors. And this would raise the need to develop the new kind of extreme fast computers, what can be used also for code-breaking.

Sources:

http://www.wired.co.uk/article/quantum-computing-explained

https://thestack.com/data-centre/2017/12/15/australian-engineers-design-silicon-based-quantum-chip/

Picture 1:

http://www.newequipment.com/sites/newequipment.com/files/styles/article_featured_standard/public/brain-quantum-computing-1620.jpg?itok=DQ7rP_xZ

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-speed-of-supercomputer-is-not-alone.html

The dance of robots

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The modern way to teach robots is not similar than making programs. It could be like teaching children. In this scenario, the programmer would take the robot by hand, and then make the movement of robot’s hand with it. After this, the system will record the movements, what are needed to take the example the glass from the table. But how to teach the robot to dance. This is the question of the week.


 And there is needed the dancer, whose character would be digitized by using laser-scanners. Then the movements of this character would be transmitted in the robot’s digital mind. After this, the robot’s computers would control it’s hydraulics like the way, that the robot makes dance movements. This is the very effective way to teach the things to robots, and the same way we can teach the language to the computer. There would be a dictionary book in the memory of this machine, and then we are starting to talk to the system.


First, we must write the answers to the computer, but when we are asked many questions, and wrote enough answers, the computer starts to work more and more independently. In this program might be three layers of answers. The first answer could be the text, what is written by the user, but when the computer learns more words, that would ask only if the answer is correct. This computer would record the questions and compile it with answers, and then compile those answers in many other things, what are involved with similar actions.


Then the robot is asked to bring the milk to the table, would the action be first, that the programmer would take the robot to the freezer, and then the robot would take the milk bottle. But when the programmer asks to bring the screwdriver, would the computer or robot uses same actions when it used in the case of the milk bottle. But now it must find that thing from somewhere else. So it starts to open the doors of lockers, and look for the things, what looks like the screwdriver.


For this action, the robot needs the picture of the screwdriver. After that robot compiles the picture in its memory to the real situation. The system, what is used in Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation can also compile the shape of the other things, and that would make those machines more independently than ever before. The bases of learning are the ability to make networks with words and actions.


And the first things in this process are the most difficult. When the first world and the action for it are made, the robot, what is controlled by speech comes near to us, by step by step. This network would give the opportunity to make the robot, what learns things itself. And this kind of robots might be dangerous in wrong hands. In real life, robots might have access to Internet dictionaries, and they can compile the orders to the databases. In this case, the robot would get orders to get the spoon.


Then robot would find what to do if it is given the order of getting something and then look for the spoon from the Internet. This makes robot easier to learn everything. And in real case robot could find the orders to use some equipment from the Internet, and in this case that could make robot very dangerous, because the programmers don’t know, what robot have been learned. In the case of robotics, the extremely important thing is to control what robot can do. There would be robot what have learned city warfare tactics and knowledge of using weapons without that the programmers even know about this, will the situation became very dangerous. Self-learning brings the uncontrollable element to tests, and this might even cost human lives.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

 http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-dance-of-robots-modern-way-to-teach.html