How to comment another person's opinions?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The problems with giving comments for blogs is that we all have right for our opinions, and this makes giving opinions quite difficult. When we are giving comments for another person writings, we must say, that there is one thing, what we must avoid. That is saying that somebody has the worse opinion than somebody else has. And even if somebody writes something stupid, would that happen because the writer has different opinions than some readers. We all have a different kind of interests every person in the world are not interested in Henry Kissinger, and what kind of actor this person was in the foreign policy of the USA.


But same way everybody is not interested in ice-hockey. And when we are thinking about opinions, we must ask one very important question: do you have right to share your opinions with other persons, who surround you, and be sure that nobody laughs at you? When we are thinking about some gangs, we must see that they are like military organizations. Then somebody says something, what is against the opinion of the gang leader, would that cause the thing, that this person, who said something, that doesn't please the leader of the gang, would not travel to next ice-hockey world championships with that person.


This is everything in the membership of some gangs. There is the absolute strict dress code, what means that those persons must also be fans of some particular ice-hockey teams, and if those persons would not have some particular opinions about those teams, would that cause kicks off the gang. This is problematic for giving comments for something, where would we not handle ice-hockey.  When some person writes about asteroids and another civilization, there are no absolute right answers for those things like wormholes and alien civilizations. Science or art is not an ice-hockey game, where the better team makes more goals than another. This makes comments for some blogs quite difficult.


There would be not straight and scientifically proven absolute truth about those things, and if you want to argue with some philosopher, would that man or woman turn the expected distance of alien civilization enough big, that the radio signals would not be in that distance before this philosopher would die. And this means that nobody can hurt dead philosopher.  This means that this man would not care anything if this person would be rest in the grave. People would not get anger anything, what they hear or see.


And this is the reason why around some military leaders were playing music because those military leaders like Albrecht Von Wallenstein surrounded themselves with musicians, because of this makes sure that any bad world in the conquerer city would not get in the ear of Wallenstein, what could cause that half of city could be executed. And the purpose of that music was to make that general unable to hear anything that was meant for that general.


Nobody wants to hear bad feedback about their writings. That means that if somebody gives bad feedback, would that person go to the first time want to close the blog because the feedback was not, what writer wants that be. We all want to get good feedback, but at the same time, we must know, that somebody might not want to see our writings in the same way, as the writer sees it. And that would cause conflicts between those persons. Maybe somebody would have the right opinion, but there are always people, who believe that they are better than another. And that might cause conflicts between those actors.


The biggest threat to dictators are people, who have the ability to think by using own brains. They can always ask real questions about the leadership. And one of the best is, that "why dictators must always rule rest of their life" second one would be that "who says that this particular leader is better than others. It would be nice to hear that thing from some dictator. That person might think that is "cool" to control everything in their political system, but as we might think, there would be very difficult to explain the dictatorial way to use police and army in those countries. And would it be nice to send political enemies to the concentration camps? Does it feel nice? And those things are very complicated for answering.But why that man believe, that he is an only good change to his nation? This is the questions, what would be nice to ask some hardcore dictators in the world, who rule their countries by iron touch.                     
https://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/                                                                            

Positive thinking of studies and the international court.

"Country choristers"
Edward Bird
(1810)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The process of learning is like stairs. It continues by the life. The first steps are dangerous, and walking thru the stairs would the man stronger and this person gets more self-esteem during that process. When we are thinking about science, we must say that there would need much motivation to learn many things in the real life. And here we always think that learning process is always some kind of race to get the top university and the top place in that society.


The most important way to make the studies motivated is to give positive feedback. Many times the feedback is limited to mistakes of the person, and this way to give feedback normally kills the motivation. Why is it so difficult to say something positive to other people? Does it give that person the motivation to be social for other people? When the person gets only bad feedback will the results be devastating for this person social skills, that seems to be the most important thing in working life.


Then we are thinking about the situation, where the person gets only negative feedback about the things what our main character does, would the result be, that the person doesn't even want to develop the social skills. The social skills are things, what needs practice. And if only feedback would be negative, the person would be transformed negative. The negative things will make all the person like some anti-personality, and this would be the very dangerous thing.


If somebody would give the wrong feedback in the wrong situation, that thing would make that person the radical and realistic character, and this is the reason, why some persons would turn to members of the fundamentalist groups. That wrong positive feedback is common, that when the person is lonely, would some radical man or woman give the simple explanation for this people situation.


Feedback what prosecutes some foreigners about the bad situation would cause the thing that somebody would turn to radicalism. And this happens in the situation, where somebody would be left alone. There would be the mechanism inside the human mind, that the individual has the need to be the member of the group. And this would be the very sad thing, if the only group, what accepts the person is some radical nazis or group of fundamentalist, that would be the very dangerous situation in the people life.The influence of groups would make the person do things, what that individual ever thought to make.


Every person in the world makes mistakes, and that is the thing, what we must realize. If the person doesn't make mistakes, that person would ever do anything. And this is the danger of negative feedback. Then the person hears only negative things about the work, would that cause the situation, where this person would not even want to try to do anything. The afraid of failures can cause the situation, where the person doesn't even want to get the job because the workplace would not give that worker anything than negative things.


And that would give the reason to hanging in the shopping centers and asking for troubles, what would get the person to the criminal activities and prison. This kind of things are the most dangerous things because those persons might make violent crimes, and the victims of the violence don't care who was guilty. From the grave would nobody come to say how grateful they are about the penalties and officials. The racism is the very good tool to collect the nation behind the military actions. And that would also the good thing to control people mind to convict that everybody who is stamped as the enemy is the same kind of person, what made some terrorist attack.


Every Muslim is always terrorist, and every foreigner is always the potential terrorist. When somebody kills the citizens of some state, that state has the obligation to defend the citizens. And this is the conflict with international law. If the maker of the terrorist attack has other nationality and that state would not admit this suspect to justice, that would cause the war. When we are talking about the tolerance of nuclear powers, we must say that the other nations are very tolerated, when the suspect is the citizen of the state, what has the big nuclear arsenal. But if suspect comes from Muslim state, would the tolerance be very small for military actions.


And that would cost lives on both sides. The problem of terrorist attacks is that those suspects are not prosecuted in international court. And they would not even get stable handling for their cases. Of course, the terror bombings must also convicted. But the makers of those actions don't let their military men justify in international court. This is very fair because here are the nations, what would get judgments in those courts, but they don't care them at all. They say that national law is always over those international courts, and they don't ever follow the judgments of those courts, and this is the problem with those tribunals. They don't have the force to order states to follow their orders, and without the support of superpowers, those attempts to force other nations to follow the judgments are doomed to fail.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/positive-thinking-of-studies-and.html

Art is the key element in symbolic function, what is necessary for memory investigation.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we visit in some art exhibition, we might notice, what kind of similarities some picture have between our real life, and what is saved in the pictures. The pictures are like triggers, what activates our memory blocks in the brains. This might feel like the artist has trapped the part of our life in the picture unless we know, that we ever meet this person in our life.


Or maybe the artist was walking down the same road and took the picture of us, and after the years this person will make the portrait. In this photo-cavalcade is the wood bite, what looks like the fish or the asteroid from another star. This kind of things will bring the memories of our past in the mind, and we can remember the fishing trips from the past. And the hands are the symbol of the making something. Do you know why the bad memories are the things what we remember first?

The reason why people have memory is that its mission is to protect the mankind. And when we see some pictures, they will activate memory blocks from the mind of the human. This is called as the symbol function in psychology. The picture activates also the creation-process in some people mind, and it will cause very intensive need to create something new. That is the reason, why some artists just focusing their work so hard, that they will not hear or see anything else. And there are stories that the artist continued the work, even the house will fall around this person.

The symbolic function is the very interesting thing, and it is commonly used in the education, and memory investigations. In the last case, the investigator uses pictures for activating the memory of the person, who is under the investigation. During that process, the investigator observes the target and the physical signals, what this person sends. Normally the investigator uses electrical equipment, what documents the body temperature and the activity of the nervous system for uncovering the truth.


Metering of body temperature will meter by the infrared sensor and the MEG-measurement, what are used for taking pictures of the person’s brain function and the flow of the blood to brain tissue. This thing tells if the person has a bad feeling or the target will be nervous. Those reactions will uncover if the person is humiliated in some place because if the victim sees the place, where the humiliation happens, will the body reacts to that picture because that picture will cause the reaction in the body.


Picture source

All images of this page have been taken in the Espoo Art exhibition. The copyrights of the art belong to the artists who have made them.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/