Wormholes can make the stable quantum channel in quantum computers.

Wormholes could make it possible to create stable quantum entanglement. But the problem is that nobody is made the quantum-size wormhole between quantum-size black and white holes. But virtualization of the wormhole is possible. 

Theoretically, things like wormholes between quantum-size black holes and white holes can make it possible to create the most powerful quantum computers that ever be possible to make. The problem is that aiming the direction of the quantum-size wormhole is difficult and the system requires enormous energy mass. 

The wormhole can aim by using superpositioned and entangled particles. And the creation of the required black hole can make by pressing the electron or proton in the middle of the ball-shaped chamber. That system can be possible somewhere in the future. 

Fullerene nanotubes inside maser-rays could use as virtual wormholes.

Fullerene nanotubes inside maser-rays could use as virtual wormholes. The maser ray protects the nanotube against outcoming radiation. And the quantum entanglement can form through that miniature fullerene channel. 

But the fullerene nanotubes are making it possible to make the virtual wormhole between the objects. The idea of the use of carbon nanotubes is that the quantum computer system basing on the idea that the carbon nanotube protects the qubit or quantum entanglement against the outcoming effects. The quantum entanglement can form through the nanotube. 

If researchers want to make it easy that energy in the virtual wormhole travels to one direction they can put Bose-Einstein condensate at another end of the nanotube. And that causes the effect where energy travels to the side of the Bose-Einstein condensate.

And if the maser ray will travel around that nanotube channel there is the possibility to make the virtual wormhole. In that virtual wormhole would be no crossing electromagnetic fields because maser rays that travel outside the nanotube deny access to natural quantum fields in that tube. That thing protects the qubit against the outcoming effect. 

The quantum computer could use the electrons that travel between laser impulses as the qubits. In that kind of system. Is easy to deny electromagnetic turbulence. The laser ray will aim at the electron. And it will push the electron through the nanotube or virtual wormhole. 

See the next terms: 

Blackhole

Quantum entanglement 

White hole 

Wormhole

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

The dark matter and the "Big Bang" theory (What was before the Big Bang?)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The parallel universe theory could be only the academical "joke" without one thing, what astronomers have found. They have discovered the thing, that there is too much matter in the universe and this dark matter, what would not send any kind of radiation makes one thing happen. There is also found the thing, called "dark energy" in the universe, and that means that the dark matter exists. There were actually found also the "dark energy, and this was sometimes explained that at the beginning of the history, just in the time of "Big Bang" was too much energy in the universe.


The "dark energy" is actually the gravitation, what caused by this dark matter, what is actually mostly atomized hydrogen, or there is a theory, that the dark matter is something more exotic. But normally I have thought that this dark matter is hydrogen or some other things like protons, what means ionized hydrogen or electrons. If the dark matter would be electrons, that thing would be noticed as the radio signals, that comes from nowhere. And maybe the "three-kelvin radiation" is part of the dark matter.


But when we are thinking about the source of that matter, what we cannot see straight, but we can see the gravitation of this so-called "dark matter", because of all calculations, what is made for calculating the universe movements are sometimes very inaccurate, what means that something disturbs metering of the objects. And when we are thinking, where that matter is coming from, there is one explanation for that. This is that just after "Big bang" the universe were full of quasars and black holes, what just exploded. In the theory of the "Big Bang", the universe was actually the hypermassive black hole, what was started to send photons.


The origin of that black hole would be in the universe, what was existed before our own universe. This supermassive particle would involve all material, what was in that past universe, And it was in the middle of nowhere in the empty space, and if the supermassive particle  would not get anything in it, would that thing cause that the black hole starts to pull the material away as a "Hawking's radiation", and because the black hole would lose its mass the steaming if the black hole would go faster and faster. And suddenly it would explode.


Somebody like me has sometimes thought that maybe "Big Bang" was caused by the impact of two hypermassive black holes, and another of those particles were antimatter, wah caused the very huge explosion. Sometimes I have seen theories, about the "Big Bang" that this very rough phenomenon, what can actually be caused by the thing, that two interplanetary nebulas were impacted together, and if another one was antimatter cloud, would the released energy level be very huge.


 When we are thinking about that theory, the different electric charges would drive those clouds together, and the annihilation would cause the born of the universe. And because annihilation, what happens when antimatter and matter touch together and the origin of dark matter could be explained that at the beginning of the universe was too much energy, and that caused that there is a matter what was not calculated.

When those clouds of antimatter and matter touched together, the annihilation caused the very big explosion, and in this case, That phenomenon would be known as the "Big Bang"  But there is another theory about the existence of the dark matter. That is that there is another universe in somewhere, and the wormhole or singularity would transfer material between another universe and our universe. This theory is very often passed in the TV-programs, but if some matter comes from another universe, would it increase the mass in our universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Hawking's radiation and wormholes

" The Sombrero Galaxy" (M-104)
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-actually-means-hawkings-radiation.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are looking at texts about Black Holes, we sometimes face the term "Hawking's radiation". But what that term means? When we are trying to Google that term, we would meet the texts, where black holes mentioned to lost from existence, by sending the "Hawking's radiation". And maybe we can now understand that term. The term "Hawking's radiation" means that sometimes one photon would flee from that supermassive piece. In this case, the black hole needs other stars or material around it, and that mass what this black hole sucks in it, that black hole can easily compensate the lost photons.


 But the situation changes when the black hole would transfer to absolute empty space, where is not even light or electrons around it. There would happen the case, that the black hole will be steamed away because of the electrons or photons are flying from that piece. When we are talking about material, also the photons and electrons have mass, and when the structure where even the light cannot flee, would pull the electrons and photons inside it, would it get more mass for it. Photons and electrons are actually same particles and the speed or energy level of those particles separate them from each other.


When we are thinking about my favorite thing, the wormhole or "Einstein-Rose bridge" we can say that forming that channel across the universe, should the black hole find another black hole, and then those black holes must start to oscillate with the same frequency. That would make possible to create that channel across the universe. But when we are thinking about traveling across that channel, would there be one thing sure. That would not dangerous, because of the "Einstein-Rose bridge" can forming between two black holes. And when something would come out from another side of the channel, would the black hole start to pull that thing again in it. And that means that the traveler would travel easily out from that channel. But this works only if those black holes would have the same mass.


If another black hole would be bigger than another, the results would be devastating.  If the black hole what sends the particle to the wormhole is bigger, it works like the super cannon, what can accelerate the particle at very high speed. And if something comes out from wormhole with the speed of light, would the result be that impact energy would destroy the planet immediately. When the case would turn that receiving black hole would be bigger, the piece what would send thru that tunnel, would it snap back to the sender with destructive results, and the  If human race would sometimes use wormholes for traveling across the universe, we must be sure, that those black holes would be the same size.


This means that traveling thru the electromagnetic wormholes are just in the level of theory. When we are thinking about traveling thru that tube, we must send the spacecraft to the targeted solar system, and then it would make the electromagnetic wormhole, and the similar singularity would be produced on the Earth, and that would allow traveling between stars. But first, we must send the spacecraft to another star, and it would take very long time. There is one thing what we ever thought, and that is, the ship what travels thru those "bridges" should across the central point of the wormhole, that it could travel to another side of that tube. And that can be done by using rockets to give more speed to our fictional spacecraft. When we are talking about intergalactic traveling, we can make wormhole near the center of our galaxy, and then drive the spacecraft thru that supermassive black hole. and if there is a wormhole between two supermassive black holes would the travel be very calm.


But if the partner is the normal black hole, would the result be, that spacecraft would travel very roughly in somewhere where we ever thought to send that fictional spaceship. This text is, of course, hypothetical thinking about the world of wormholes, and I used that space trip as an example how difficult is to make those trips thru the wormhole safely. And in the real life would happen very badly, because there might be no wormhole between two black holes.


And actually, we don't even know where those roads between two black holes would end, and that means that the trip across that channel would be like random, and we cannot be sure, where we would send that hypothetical spaceship if we would find small enough black hole, what we could cope with our own technology. In that case, we would find the very small black hole, and then we would create the electromagnetic black hole, what would oscillate with the same frequency, and of course, that artificial black hole should be the same size than the targeted black hole.


If we are thinking carefully that ship what travels thru the black holes, must send across the central point of the wormhole, and that would be key to travel across those channels. If the ship would stay in the center point of the wormhole,  it would stay in there forever. And then the use of motors would transfer it to another black hole. But this is only fiction, and good day to spend time with thinking about those phenomena, what are actually the most high energy thing in the universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/M104_ngc4594_sombrero_galaxy_hi-res.jpg/1200px-M104_ngc4594_sombrero_galaxy_hi-res.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-actually-means-hawkings-radiation.html