The strange life of Mary Shelley

Mary Shelley (nee Godwin)
(1797-1851)

http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/the-strange-life-of-mary-shelley.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Mary Shelley (1797-1851) was the writer of the book “Frankenstein” or “The modern Prometheus”. This woman was one of the first female horror-writers, and the book, what she was written is still in the lockers of the libraries. In her young ages, she faced many deaths, and her husband, who was five years elder than Mary, was died in 1822 by accident when his boat fold near Sardinia. The suicide was the fate of the Mary Shelley's stepsister, and the first wife of her husband also committed suicide. Mary's husband wealthy poet Percy Shelley (1792-1822) died in the accident when his Ariel-schooner fold in the Sardinia.


Famous writer Mary Shelley was born with the name Mary Godwin in the London 1797, and she died for the brain tumor in the age 53 for the year 1851. There are some rumors, that the brain tumor caused the ultimate productivity of that person, and when we are looking about those mysterious deaths in her younghood, where the first wife of her husband drown herself, must those cases be investigated more careful than they were done. There is one feeling left, that somebody killed those people on purpose, for hiding something. Or why two persons, who knew Mary Shelly committed suicide almost at the same time?


There was something, what somebody would not that anyone would know, and that secret was so big, that this actor was ready to make those murders for giving Mary room for life. And then the tumor killed that nice writer at the age of 53. Before that, the tumor had taken the ability to move from that woman. When we are looking at the critics, what the book took from the newspapers, we must understand one thing, no writer can make texts without sources, what gives them the inspiration. Without inspiration is impossible to write. And when the critics say, that Mary Shelley was just channeled the male company ideas to the paper, we must say, that every writer in the world makes those things. They would write the worlds, what they hear to the memory, and then write their books by using that kind of techniques.

Percy Shelley
(1792-1822)

So the writer of the “Frankenstein” was Mary Shelley did the critics like that or not. But when we are thinking about the connection between productivity and the brain tumor, there might be made some experiments, where inside the human skull have put the silicone bites, what mission were press the brains, and simulate the tumors. The purpose of those tests would be to increase the productive thinking of the humans. And they might be made in the mental hospitals. In those surgical tests the victim's skull would be opened, and then the silicone bite would be set inside the skull, that it would press the brains in the precise right angle. And that would make the same kind of function than real tumor causes.


When we are thinking about the life of the Mary Shelley, her husband was somehow denigrated, and the reason, why the property of his family is always mentioned is somehow left out of my understanding. Also, Lord Byron was the wealthy man, and the traveling across Europe was expensive even in that time. When we are thinking about falling in love with Percy and Mary Shelley, they started to date, when Mary was 16 years old.




And then her father denied the meetings, but Mary flees to her stepsister. she told her father, that she would be committed the suicide if that man would try to separate her from the Percy, who was married. But then the wife of Percy Shelley drown herself, and the marriage was possible. And that happened with the permission of Mary’s father, who did not talk to his daughter anything in years. And for some reasons also Mary’s step-sister committed suicide in those days, and that kind of things cannot be the coincidence.


There were many accidents and suicides around Mary Shelley. Here we must say that we sometimes think, that people know Percy Shelley only by his wife Mary, who wrote the novel “Frankenstein”. This man was one of the major Romantic poems in England. Sometimes is told that Percy himself has kicked off the university, because of some atheistic circular, what maker he would not want to inform. And that caused, that this man was broke his relationships with his parents. But he wrote one bigger poem collection “Alastor or The Spirit of Solitude”  but he died before age of 30 in the boat accident. But this poet made also other poems, and one book, what was named as "The Necessity of Atheism".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Shelley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Bysshe_Shelley

Caput Mundi: I was in there too: the analyzes of the book "The Tales of Ensign Stål"

Albert Edelfelt's Illustration
for the poem "Sven Dufva"
(Picture I)

     

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/caput-mundi-i-was-in-there-too-analyzes.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Our national writer Johan Ludvig Runeberg used that term in the book named  "The Tales of Ensign Stål". Sometimes I have thought that is this book written in the same purpose, as the "Protocol of the eldest of Zion", what is the most well-known propaganda book, what was written by the political police of Russian Empire. Maybe the "The Tales of Ensign Stål" was also written by the same institution for supporting the emperor's policy in Finland. The "Protocol of the eldest of Zion was written for making the confiscating the property of Jews justified.


Maybe the book of Runeberg had the mission to justify the confiscation of the property of Swedish noblemen in Finland.  And maybe he wanted to mention that he was in the same war, as this 1st. Lieutenant, who told tales of that war, what separated Finland from Sweden. I sometimes think that this writer wanted to remember, that there were many men, who saw that war in a different way than this 1st. Lieutenant, who was lead his men in the war, what was quite short, and that man, who was claimed, that his name was Stål told many interesting things, about his men, and heroes of the war in 1808 to 1809, where Russians won the badly prepared Swedish army in one year, and then connected Finland to Russian empire as an autonomic area. Because Runeberg mentioned, that "I was there too", was that he maybe saw the things in the point of view of the regular soldier, whose mission was to follow orders, and march to the fire, when the superiority officers to go.


Sometimes I have thought, that maybe Runeberg was invented those stories by his own head, and maybe some of them were mentioned for calumniating the Swedish officers, and claim that being together with Russian empire was more comfortable than joining back to Sweden. Why I suspect that this book is at least partially written for propaganda purposes, is that the writer of the book uses Finnish name. And the man called "Stål" was of course Swedish. Maybe the purpose of this layout was to show Finnish, that Swedish officers didn't care at all their fate in the battle. When we are thinking about the most well-known hero of that book, Sven Dufva, who was left to defend bridge alone, and he managed to take his position until bullet took his life by hitting the heart.


The situation is quite interesting because Runeberg suggests that the position could be kept if somebody didn't leave Dufva alone. That man claimed to be somehow stupid, but here I'm thinking about this situation, where "Stål" tells this story. Maybe he had the very bad conscience about that action, and he tried to confess himself, that he made the right thing for Dufva. And maybe some of those stories have written in some beer houses, where everybody could claim, that he could be some "Ensign Stål" from the Northern war. And guess what: this man, who claims that his name was Johan Ludvig Runeberg ever claimed to written historical fact. He wanted to sell his book to readers, who paid the workers. And all writers were under the observation of political police of Russian empire, and if their writings were not pleased the censorship officials, would that kind of artist's end be sent to Siberia or the execution in some cellar.


Maybe some of those writers were well known, and they had many friends. That's why the political police used syphilis injection to make those artists maniac, and then the execution was easier to make. And this might be the fate of Alexis Kivi, one of our national writers. Syphilis is normally quite harmless bacteria if the medical team uses antibiotics for giving the cure for the infection. But if there would be no medicine for that infection, would the syphilis bacteria transfer to human brains, and cause the brain syphilis, what causes mental illness and death. Runeberg was the right man for making the book named "The Tales of Ensign Stål". This book was used in the key element in very large scale propaganda operations, and of course, some propagandists used the character of Stål and changed the identity of this man as some general of the Swedish army. This made the propaganda so effective.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tales_of_Ensign_St%C3%A5l

Picture I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tales_of_Ensign_St%C3%A5l#/media/File:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Sven_Duva.jpg

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/caput-mundi-i-was-in-there-too-analyzes.html