What is so special with Russian relationship with nuclear weapons?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-so-special-with-russian.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We always read stories about Russian new nuclear weapons, and of course, we must notice, that Russian military forces have the very strong relationship with those weapons. Nuclear weapons give attention to every nation, what have those weapons, and they are the good shield for every state. And at the same time, we might wonder, why Russian government doesn't even try to introduce a single defensive nuclear weapon?


Of course we can say, that offensive attack against enemy military forces is the best defense, but then we must consider, that attacking against other nations is always against international law, and making that with high power nuclear weapons causes very much suffering and pain in targeted states, where millions of people would die in those attacks. But why Russia always develops that kind of weapons, what uses megaton size nuclear warheads?



One of the reasons for that is sometimes mentioned, that Russian conventional strike capacity is not so good that NATO has. There are own problems with making GPS-guided bombs and missiles, what allows airplanes to close the target in free angle, and that satellite-guided ammunition is "fire and forgets"-type munitions. Same way some of the equipment of Russian military are very old, and there might be problems in their tolerance. I mean that any nuclear reactor is not outlasted forever.


But there could be more problems in the military technology, what is not mentioned. The Russian military has problems to get computer programs and electronic components, what is needed for high-tech military systems like drones. And the attitudes of the old fashion generals and admirals makes problematic to make new kind of intelligent military technology in the hands of the Russian military. Those generals believe the power of tanks and artillery, with massive firepower. The result of that is seen in Syria, where Russian bombardment destroyed over 80% of infrastructure. That bombardment was effective against the infrastructure of targeted cities, but the destruction was very massive. And the use of firepower was similar as in Grozny, where the use of massive firepower caused more damages than any terrorist organization could ever make.


This is the problem with the Russian military. When they would destroy entire cities, they would not able to take DNA and other samples from ruins, what would help to track terrorists, and maybe some members of terrorist organizations could slip off those areas claiming that they were dead. But this is only thinking about problems about using massive firepower in the urban area. And maybe some Nazis could slip off the Berlin because they were claimed that they were dead.


Maybe some of them would ever found because their bodies were exploded in pieces in the bombardment of Red Army artillery.  The main problem of the Russian military is the very huge size of that country, and this has maybe caused that many wars have been canceled for that reason. In Russia is about 146 million people, that means there is very small population if that is compiling with the size of that country. And that nation has many neighbors, what of course wants to take part of Russian natural wealthiness like oil and metals. This means that if the Russian military would go in the full-scale operations in Europe, some other country could seize this hypothetical situation and attack against Russia, would that state need nuclear weapons for protecting itself.


The Russian military has the problem, that if some man fights in the European area, that same man cannot protect Russian borders in the Far East. And that is, of course, the very good break for military operations in European territory. And we must know that Russia is the nation with nuclear weapons, and we must live with that thing. There is also very much natural resources like gas, what Russia wants to sell to the West, and that makes the relationship with that nation very complicated, and many political leaders wants to forget the situation in Ukraine, because that makes problematic to buy gas from Russia, and if the Russian gas would be used in European power plants, gives that  possibility for Russia to blackmail European countries, by cutting gas deliveries, if some nations policy doesn't please Russian leaders. This means that if some leaders of European Union talks against Russia, would the pressure in the gas tube decreased, and that would be the good method for controlling the economy in another country by using the non-violent method.


The reason for decreasing gas-pressure could be explained as the service of the gas tube. And that would be one method to give pressure for European countries to understand that Russia is the superpower and other nations should understand that. And nuclear weapons are very big status in International politics and good shield against military aggression against that nation. They would raise the tolerance limit for Russian actions extreme high, and for the same reason, many other nations have to get those weapons because they are giving better position in the international field of diplomatic talking.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-so-special-with-russian.html

The fear is an effective weapon itself, and use of gas shows that nobody is safe

The World War II propaganda poster
about gas danger
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The fear is the weapon of the persons who make murders or political murders, what is called as assassinations. Purpose of those actions is to make people afraid of their personal safety. And this might be the very good tool to keep people quiet about the things, what should not talk about. The purpose of use highly radioactive and highly toxic chemical agents might show, that killers have relationships, and this causes of course fear.


Those things are not very easy to get, and their handling needs property training. The poisoning of victims is claimed to be very common in the world of intelligence. There are rumors that many enemies of Russian leaders have been died by some neurotoxin, and one of the victims was Analy Sobchak, the chief of the St. Petersburg. This was first mentioned a case when the enemy of Russian leaders claimed to be poisoning by using some chemical agent.


The suspected chemical agent of this case was VX-nerve gas, what was painted on the lamp, and then the temperature of the room was decreased below 20 degrees Celsius. When the lamp was turned on, the temperature raised, and the nerve agent was released into the air. In this case, the murderer was very clever, and this person might have right relationships to get this extremely poisonous chemical in the hands. But the problem with this chemical is that the normal botulin can also be used in this kind of operation.


Botuline is the most deadly poison in the world. It is creating with the rotten flesh in anaerobic space. And the production of this highly toxic chemical is very easy. This poison is actually similar what sea snake uses The only thing, what is needed is a closed bottle, what would fill by flesh and soil. The bacteria would create botulin and it can be put in the timed cooker, what would heat and stem this chemical to the air. The problem with botulin is that chemical is the functionary group of VX- organophosphate chemical agent. If the killer has put phosphor in this combination,  this person would produce VX very easily.


Then the rumors ended, until Anna Politkovskaya was killed, and the rumors began again. After this ex KGB official Alexander Litvinenko was killed by using Polonium. After this was the fresh case, where ex. KGB agent, who defected to British intelligence was attempted to murder with some nerve agent. This case might see very dramatic because his daughter was found unconscious with him, and the Russian national TV-channel gave the warning about those people, who flee from KGB. This might be warning to those people, who are against the leaders of Kreml, but that might be set up. Why Kreml seems quilty so clearly, and if the Kreml is guilty, why they used the chemicals like Polonium?


But when we are looking at those actions or crimes sharper, we must see, that those murders are often shown straight to Putin. And this would make theories, that some person is hiding behind Kreml’s back. Why are they seem the job of KGB so clearly? When two defected KGB agents were killed, the suspect might be KGB, but who was given those orders? Are they given because somebody wants to hide something, what happened in the Cold War? Or is this some kind of attempt to break the relationship with Russians and another world? When the Kreml looks like guilty the investigations would be ended or they could be very slow. But there are crimes to investigate, and we cannot say anything yet. The Russians are afraid of the security service, and that would close many mouths.

Sources:
The VX film
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0DXV210OhQ

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Sobchak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Politkovskaya

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/uk-focuses-investigation-sites-poisoned-spy-case-53602236

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VX_(nerve_agent)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botulinum_toxin

Picture 1

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/27/0f/0b/270f0b5ed45c64b2e49dd05786c38828.jpg


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-fear-is-effective-weapon-itself-and.html

What is the problem with the question of Jerusalem?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-question-of.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-question-of.html