Sven Dufva, the most well-known character of "The tales of Ensign Stål"

(Picture I)

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/sven-dufva-most-well-known-character-of.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is the philosophical point of view to Sven Dufva is the most well-known poems of the book "The tales of Ensign Stål". We actually don't know if this character pure fictional or is behind it some real person. That man said to be big and strong, and sometimes I have had a very interesting thought in my mind. That is "could Sven Dufva is automaton". That theory is very wild, but as we know, the automaton fascinated theologians, military leaders, and philosophers all around the world. And sometimes I have thought that if this very interesting character could be some kind of automaton.


This wild theory might explain, why this man was so slow. If this man was some kind of early robot, it would be the very fascinating thing for historians. This poem is the tale of the soldier, who was not very smart. This man left behind others and defended some bridge alone against Russians. The poem is very strange because there is told, that if Dufva would get help, could the army stay in the positions.


But as we know that this man had no change at all to win the battle alone, and then we must say, that if that man had a machine gun, could he kept the position, but armed with a musket, that man had no change. A bridge what this man ordered to defend was not very wide because Sven Dufva could defend it alone. Sven Dufva's bridge has sometimes searched in Finland, but nobody claims to find it. And that has made somebody thought that maybe this man is only the production of images, what came to somebody's mind during the writing process. But somebody believes that this man was real, and they have wanted to find the grave of this creature.


What makes Dufva so mysterious, is that he claimed to be a little bit slow, or there was something problem in his head. And I sometimes have thought that what was the reason for that? Could he just be the Finnish spoken person, who just had difficulties to understand commands, what were given by using Swedish?  In that time Finnish was not an official language in Swedish empire, but that was not spoken very much outside the universities and royal offices.  And if Dufva would not get practice for that language, could the military service be very difficult.


 And if his fellows didn't know about that language problem, would this poor man seem some kind of slow, what could make difficult to get promotions and handling all other things were very difficult, because Swedish officials didn't speak or wrote Finnish. In that army, everybody has expected that every man used Swedish in official papers, commands, and free-time social interaction. If somebody didn't handle Swedish good enough, that could mean, that he would be isolated from the social interaction of the unit.


But when he fell by enemy bullets, the bullet hits to the heart of that man. And sometimes people have thought, that maybe there was some kind of steel plate under the skin, what could be stopped the bullets, what shot to that man's head. Maybe that metal plate put in his head some doctor, who gave Dufva the cure of the broken skull, but this is only thinking, and my dear friends, we don't know if this character real or fiction.  And some other people think that maybe this Sven Dufva was some kind of mechanic human. Those early robots were used in very limited missions, and they were actually like walking clocks, what were made for fun.


But in some cases, those mechanic men or automaton were planned to equip with explosives, and send to the enemy lines. Those robot men were very difficult to make, and that's why they were made only very little quantum. Somebody claims that even the action movie character "Rambo" have got influence from this almost mythical creature. This creature is one of the most fascinating characters in the history of books, what are written in Finland.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tales_of_Ensign_St%C3%A5l

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automaton


Picture I

http://www03.edu.fi/oppimateriaalit/stool/kuvat/02sven13.jpg

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/sven-dufva-most-well-known-character-of.html

Who was René Descartes?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/who-was-rene-descartes.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This writing is meant for thinking about the personality of Renè Descartes who was the great philosopher and thinker. I always thought that maybe this name was meant for hiding identity of this remarkable thinker, and because I have lived in Finland long time, I have sometimes thought that maybe this person's real home language was Finnish. Maybe this helped him hiding his identity from the royal police.  Philosophers are professional thinkers, who always think the things like "why my professor has always the glass of water with him when this person would start to keep lectures?


Is that because my professor wants to drink that water at the midpoint of the lecture? Or is it meant the mark, that professor is selling the answers to the examinations? Or is the reason for keeping that glass on the table meant for some kind of water clock, what mission is to show, how time is running during the lecture, given that the professor drinks that water all the time? Or is it for the secret sign that everything is all right? Maybe it is signal that professor is a member of secret Illuminati society? And then we must ask, what happens if that glass is missing?  Do the bodyguards of that man run into the auditorium?


The thing what I just wrote, was meant, for example, that means the philosophical way of thinking. It is actually modeling the question about something like water glasses, and then philosopher tries to find the deeper aspect of the question "why professor keeps the glass of water on the table"? That makes their writings easier to marketing, and of course, the things like secret societies are the very good trick, when their books are put on the sale. Those things make those writings more fascinating than some "I think, I am" style phrases. And of course the jokes made those writings very easy to read, and the best joke was, that the King of Sweden was sacrificed his own troops in battles, and the reason was that the salaries did not need to pay to those dead men.


That was, of course, the conspiracy theory, and maybe somebody told another joke, that the king has been leaked the information of the military tactics of Sweden to the enemy, that they could kill enough his soldiers. Then some thinker noticed that war are the good way to get rid of the political enemies of the King of Sweden. Death on the battlefield was very much easier to explain, than executions. And if the soldier dies on the battlefield, nobody ever reads anything, what that man has written, because real soldiers ever wrote anything was the policy in that time.


If the man died in the front line, there would not leave any dangerous papers where was embarrassing information behind that man. And that speaker, of course, argued this speak that the Swedish empire was in the war in the era of every king or ruler of Sweden. And that was the reason for the suspect that the wars were used to clean the empire from the people, who had utopias that normal people would sometimes take control in their nations. Political enemies were more easy to kill with troops of the enemy. In university is the point or vision that students learn to think themselves. Also, many examinations in University is made for the people, who think the things themselves. Independent thinking is a road to freedom of thinking, and in this case, we must say that in the free-thinking process, would not need to prove anything.


Of course, the philosopher would look for some information to support the opinions, what he or she introduces in the writings. But the real key is that writer must rhetorically argue, why the text has the purpose, and why other persons should read it. And if somebody claimed that the king of Sweden goes to war for saving money was the very interesting example of the way to handle the economic problems of the state. In that time the rhetoric was very interesting and maybe other persons wanted to read those texts because that was the very good example of the ability to think self,  and this kind of men are dangerous for people, who want to keep absolute power in their hands.


That's why this man wrote by using French, what was the main language of European civilized people, who were mainly males in that time when women had only one place to be. Their place was to stay at home and serve the husbands. But when we are thinking about the identity of Descartes, we must realize that maybe this man didn't even speak French. The name what he used was probably created by hiding this person's real identity. And maybe this name where is apostrophe over the second "E" letter was meant to confess other persons, that the writer of those texts is coming from France. Of course, the real identity of that man kept in secret. There is a couple of things about the philosophers and science of language, what normal people should know. Have you ever thought that maybe the great philosopher didn't even speak French? In the real-life Descartes might only write French, and that could make this man's real identity stood hidden from other people.


By the way, who told that Descartes was a man? Here we must think, was Descartes even a single person? Or was Descartes the group of writers? There might also be a woman behind that name, and of course, the writings of that man were caused little anger in the minds of Caroline officers, who took the critiques what was targeted to the King very seriously. Maybe sometimes the great philosopher didn't even know, what was his cover name. And there might happen that some students have sit in the same table with Descartes, and made the notes about what this man was spoken.


Then they would put that text to the bulletin board, and then the applause were very strong, when some Caroline officer lost the temper. And that was the mark that Descartes was really wrote something, what made him existed person to everybody in the Swedish Empire. There is many things, what is told about famous philosophers, and maybe I must sometimes spend an evening with René by reading about this man and his ideas, that I would understand about those men and women, who are written words what lives forever. And also I want to be and I try to think myself, like René Descartes sometimes wrote in the library of University or in some beer house in Sweden in 18th. century.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/who-was-rene-descartes.html

What actually is ancient Greece in philosophy?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many times in philosophy have mentioned some persons from ancient Greece. That place and time were full of philosophers, who created many thoughts about things, like idealistic republic and atomic models, but people almost ever asked one simple questions about those philosophers. They ever ask "why those texts are made in long time ago"? In philosophy, the key thing is not proof anything like in some empiric investigations. And what means or what is the role of ancient Greece or philosophers of ancient Greece in that profession. Another question goes like this: what is the difference between the philosophical and historical Greece?


The element of philosophy is to use rhetorical argumentation, what makes those texts or speeches feeling right. And the problem of philosophy is that philosophers are professional thinkers, who sometimes say something, what is not pleased the persons who keep the force in their hands. And that's why is more comfortable to say that some ancient philosopher said those things before some Voltaire said those things in some place because in those cases Mr. Voltaire would be escorted in the cellar of that castle, and then the brutal extortion began.


In the time of Voltaire, there was one golden rule in making writings. The kings or other noblemen should not embarrassed, and the best way to embarrass those people was show that they were wrong. Kings were perfect people, what means the thing, that they could ever be wrong in many cases. But when we are going to meet the modern philosopher's relationship with some man, named Socrates or Plato, we must say that none of the modern philosophers could ever meet those persons from ancient Greece. And in the real life, we can't go and ask anything from Plato or Socrates.


Maybe in some day in tomorrow we could build a time machine, and then we could go to meet those great men from Greece, but before that, we can only use our imagination, why those philosophers claimed to say something, what might be the reason, that those philosophers have made so much claiming. Other philosophers have put their own texts to their name, and we can't go to ask those Greeks that what they really have said or written in some garden in ancient Greece at the beginning of history.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Twilight of the thunder god

"Open air philosopher's seat"

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a fictional and philosophical text about the electricity and living forever, so please don't try this at home. Living forever have always been the dream of the human race, and that was fascinated some scientists, who have made experiments, what is so dangerous, that we ever can imagine doing that kind of things. Here I'm writing about the experiments, what are made in 19th. century, by the inventors of electricity. Those persons believed that the electricity gave the power of life to the creature, and then they wanted to make person young just using electricity. They continued the road, what was begin by philosophers of ancient Greece. In that time those persons might believe that Zeus, the god of thunder could transfer the person young by using lightning for that purpose. So some philosophers could stand on the hill, and wait for the lightning strikes to them.


This might cause the disappearing of those wise men because the lightning will cause that this person might disappear by heat. The second attempt was created by some Dr. Frankenstein when he put the test person on the table and conducted electricity to the person body, and that was created the most elegant voice effect or new funerals because the electricity stopped the person's heart and caused terrible pain. Those tests were extremely dangerous because DC-power stops the heart very easily.


That's why nobody should build own electric baton because DC-electricity makes that equipment deadly even if the used electric capacity is low. When we are thinking about the problems of "being young forever", we must understand that the eldering is caused by destroying the DNA and also the increase of pollution in the human body. Some of those symptoms of eldering process are caused by pollution in the structure of mitochondrion, and very often that is caused the pollution in the mitochondrion, what are actually independent parts of cells.


The pollution what causes the eldering process normally comes from mitochondrion energy production.  In some scenarios, the "mad scientist" can make the tests that the mitochondrion energy production would be stopped by ricin, and then the electric equipment would use to keep the heart functioning. During this process person's body would be clean from pollution.


Please don't try this at home, because if something goes wrong, the result would be funerals. But if cells energy production would be blocked, and when the blood is flowing and it is cleaning in the system, what same times oxygenating blood, would it give change to clean the body and give more lifetime. And when the man wanted to wake up, they would need only the electric shock to the heart, and the problem would be only the loss of the muscles during that "time travel".


Also, the temperature must be so low, that bacteria won't destroy body  That might be fixed by using electric body building equipment, what uses electric stimulation to giving the necessary movements to the muscle. This might be a good way, to spend a couple of years in some icebox. But does that technology give the life forever? This is another question, that must ask before nothing will be done. Those things are very good ideas for some thrillers, but they are very dangerous. I don't know if there change, to restore man to the wake up if there would be given ricin injection to them.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/twilight-of-thunder-god.html

The writing about the theories about ancient advanced civilizations

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-writing-about-theories-about.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-writing-about-theories-about.html

Even the best formula driver is nothing without good equipment and the team, and this same thing can be conducted to any other thing in the world.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/even-best-formula-driver-is-nothing.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/even-best-formula-driver-is-nothing.html

What kind of spaceships would the aliens use, if they want to observe us, or we if we want to observe them?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-kind-of-spaceships-would-aliens.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-kind-of-spaceships-would-aliens.html