North-Korea did it again

Picture I

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/north-korea-did-it-again.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The North-Korean government did the same thing, what it made before, and continues improvements of the nuclear reactor. This is the thing, what many people expected because the nuclear program is a very good shield for that government. The nuclear weapon development of that state is the very interesting thing because these weapons are made for eliminating both, internal and external threats for that government. People of the world hoped, that the leaders of this country would keep their promises, but the truth is, that those people talk about other things and do other things. The reason, why Kim Jon Un met Donald Trump was clear, he wanted to win the time because the missiles of that country have changed problematic for other things, like food supply from China.


And now the North-Korean leader has continued the nuclear program of that country. Or somebody else has continued that program. In that country, nothing is like in normal state. Actually, the western nations would not even know, who is the real leader of that country, and there are rumors that somebody in the coulisses keeps the dictator in the hand. Actually, the official leader of that country Kim Jong Un is a member of the "Room 39", what is very secretive and powerful organization in the leading party of that country.


There are many other people in the party, who would not give their position easily. Many of those people are age over 50 and they have done more than Kim Jong Un, and their crimes are very big. The reality of the "Room 39" is that they would not always follow the orders of the leader, because if that state would be democratized those elder members of the party will get punishments for their crimes. The problem with the Worker's party of the North-Korea is that is the militaristic organization, what has the name "party". This party has been the tool for the power of Kim's family, but there are also other persons in the power.


And those other people would not always tell to Kim, what they are doing. They want to use their power behind the back of the leaders of the North-Korea. Of course, Kim's family is very powerful, but as I told they are not North-Korea alone. The foreign enemy would keep the nation homogeneous and gives mission for the military. And fast-changing policy guarantees that the North-Korea would have threats, what it can use for argue the power of the Worker's party, and the position of Kim's family in that organization, what have kept power in the North-Korea from 1950's.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/27/north-korea-nuclear-reactor-upgrades-summit-pledges

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_39

Picture I
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8b/e4/4f/8be44fd1ee96840299d47d90f70c2f48.jpg

About the skepticism and the meeting between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-skepticism-and-meeting-between.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Skepticism is always the good thing, but also optimism is important when we are talking about the meetings like North Korean and the United States leaders. The major part of the philosophy of defense is that nations should believe in the peace, but prepare for war. This is the thing with the relationships between those two states, what have nuclear power behind their leaders. When we are thinking about positivism and the normalizing the relationships between nations, we must say that positivism would tempt the North Korean government start to make changes in their country, and in this situation, the best way to act is to encourage this advantage.


But also there is also very many contracts in history, what the North Korean leaders have put their names in the papers, and then they have broken those promises. The most well-known case about that kind of politics has been re-beginning of the nuclear program of that nation. This program was given results, what we all know. And in the real world, there is many frighten weapons of mass destruction than some nuclear weapons can ever be.

Ranges of North Korea's missiles
Picture II

The biological weapons are more deadly than nuclear weapons, and North Korea has probably those organisms in their laboratories. The delivering of the organisms like Ebola is easier than launching nuclear weapons. The structure of delivering system would be lighter, and then delivering that kind of organisms can be made by dropping the test tubes from satellites. This is one of the worst nightmares in the world.


If North Korea would break the contract, and deny the meetings, we must face the similar problems than before. And the North Korean leaders would be stronger than ever before because they can use nuclear weapons in the shield of internal politics. There are rumors, that there is hiding nuclear weapons in the Pyongyang, what is ready to explode if the leaders of that country are in danger. But when we are talking about the nuclear weapons of the United States arsenal, we must also face the truth, that this nation has more threats than North Korea, and if it would start to disarming its systems, must the Russia and China also cutting their strike capacity.


And they would not go in that process, because those nations feel that India, Pakistan, Great Britain and France are also the threat to those nations, and there would be more nations in the nuclear club,because the membership in this group of the nation guarantees the respective handling of those nations in the international areas. And that's why many nations want those weapons for protecting their interests in the global environment.

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ct-0YyoSOsU/maxresdefault.jpg

Picture II

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCDEHZjXoAAERzk.jpg

In this situation, there is no right actions

Picture I

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/p/in-this-situation-there-is-no-right.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Positivism is the thing, what would make advantages for everything in the world. And the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un is one of the most positive things, what has been happened in the world. When we are thinking of the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, there are many things, that leaves questions in the air. And when we are thinking this situation from the side of Donald Trump, there would be no right actions and the solutions for the situation in the Korean peninsula would not have the solution in the short period.


There were set no timetables when those advantages between the relationship of the USA and North-Korea, but this meeting in Singapore was the very nice sign, and we always want to believe the best of the advantage in that area. But there is a long trip to go until the relationship between Koreas would be stabilized, and of course, the internal situation in North Korea is very different than in the western world.


But as we know this kind of diplomacy might encourage the leaders of North Korea to make also internal political advantages to that country. And those questions are very difficult for every nation in the world. But when we are thinking about the role of those leaders, in that meeting, we might say, that North Korea is facing the new kind of political solutions, and probably in someday the Koreas would be living together.


Of course, North Korea has its internal problems but when we are looking to the history, the same kind of problems had also the Soviet Union, and nobody didn't ever say any negative things about the relationship for that nation, what had similar prison camps like North Korea. And here might some person ask, "what is the difference between relationships between the western world and North Korea and the western world and the Soviet Union. Everybody knew about prison camps in the Soviet Union and the relationships for that country were ever judged in any country.


And if Trump would walk away from this meeting, we might hear again, how childish that man is. Now the North Korean leader would get the propaganda victory about this meeting, but as we know that the nuclear weapon is the very good thing for stabilizing the situation in every part of the World. And as we know, Trump had another choice, what would be nice to see, and that is the showing finger to that meeting, and again the bad boy would be Trump. So this man cannot do anything right if we are looking at the articles, what has been written recently.


The relationships between the USA and North Korea must be normalized, and this is the key question in this situation. In the same time, the USA cannot forget its allies, because the situation in the South China Sea is going to be tight. And the purpose of the artificial islands in that area is to offer military bases for China combat aircraft and naval vessels. This means that also the USA needs allies in that area, what offers the bases for the aircraft and other military units. And if the relationships between the USA and South Korea would be worse, the airbases and naval support bases would not in use if the conflict would begin in that area. Those bases are needed for emergency landing sites for the damaged aircraft, and the problem is that not a single modern aircraft could be given to China, even in the wreck condition.


China has tested the laser weapons, and those things are now in operational condition. The information of that was taken from the China's Africa's military base, what have targeted those weapons to the  United States fighters. And because the incident happened in far away from China motherland, that would show, that the laser weapons of that country have become in the operational system. This conclusion, that the lasers of the Chinese military forces are now becoming operational is made because nobody knows why somebody would be brought weapon system, what is under development to the overseas base.

Sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-laser-weapons-2018-5?r=UK&IR=T&IR=T

https://thediplomat.com/2018/05/possible-use-of-blinding-laser-weapon-near-chinas-djibouti-base-spurs-us-warning-to-aviators/

Picture I

http://assets4.bigthink.com/system/tinymce_assets/4161/original/north_korea_dark.jpg?1481542875


https://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/06/12/in-this-situation-there-is-no-right-actions/

About situation in Ukraine

7K720 Iskander missile
(NATO SS-26 "Stone")
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vladimir Putin and the situation in Ukraine are not been very often in a stand at public media. Reason for that is there is nothing going on in that place, what is called as the Crimean peninsula. This place is in very important strategic location when we are thinking about a transportation of Caucasian oil and gas by tubes to European markets. If the Caucasian oil and gas will replace Russian products, that would mean the decrease of Russians economic and political influence. And in the real world, that means that Russia cannot cut those deliveries for having political acceptance for other actions. If the nation doesn't use Russian oil and gas, the threat would give only by the military forces. And it looks like bad in the international politics. Open threading by weapons will cause the public opinion turn against Russia.

And there have been ideas of massive United Nations peacekeeping operations in Ukraine, but the reason of Russian military power the passion for this kind of operations is much lower than in Afghanistan and Iraq. Russian nuclear force is the very frightening thing, what will make think twice, if somebody wants to operate in Ukraine with United Nations mandate. Russian interest is that situation in Ukraine will forget as fas as possible. Also, many European countries will want to normalize their relationship with Russian leaders.


If we think that the USA would come in this situation with military forces, we must say, that this scenario is very improbable, because this nation has been in the war since 2001, and that would be not very good for the reputation of that country. The prize of that war is very high, and the operation in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost more than the Second World War. Also, the losses of human lives in those wars have been very high, and the people of USA have tired about the war.


The war between the USA and Russia would be the World War III, what might mean nuclear holocaust, where the big part of the human population will be killed. This is the reason, why the solution to this problem is not able to find the military way. The problem with this crisis is that Russian military has got power to stand in that area, and those troops are highly protected by nuclear weapons, what has installed on highly mobile battlefield systems warships.


Those weapons are extremely difficult to detect, and they have the capacity to destroy the entire city. If those truck-mounted weapons would detect, they are quite easy to destroy by tactical fighters, helicopters or commando-strike. But the detection is the problem. The weapon itself can be destroyed by anti-tank weapons or bombs. If the core of the bomb will be broken, radioactive plutonium will be delivered to the ground.  But of course, nuclear weapons have the very hard defense and strikes can be shielded by the security-fire by the security team. So this makes those weapons extreme difficult targets for military forces. The system goes, that tactical nuclear weapons will be used in the first strike, and those weapons are supported by strategic nuclear weapons And if Russian conventional forces would get in trouble those weapons will be used in this kind of situation.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander

Picture 1
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLGxFjm2f_Q1B794FLy3bk9rbb5tBXSPfDpZFFLlDs_S8lpHxlww

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-situation-in-ukraine.html

Writing about the boring thing (Why somebody hated Alexander the Great?)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/writing-about-boring-thing-why-somebody.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/writing-about-boring-thing-why-somebody.html

What is the problem with the question of Jerusalem?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-question-of.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-question-of.html

The political terminology and the new era of populism

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-political-terminology-and-new-era.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-political-terminology-and-new-era.html