Russia confirms the successful test of a nuclear-powered cruise missile.

Vladimir Putin and media sources confirm the successful test of the Russian 9M730 Burevestnik. Or Skyfall missile. The missile itself uses a miniature nuclear reactor to give thrust. Nuclear power makes the system operate for months in the atmosphere. The missile can have the ability to travel outside the atmosphere. The Burevestnik missile is one of the new ideas that Vladimir Putin and his general staff can use to break and frighten Western opponents. The size of the Burevestnik missile is quite small. That system can be transported using submarines. Intercontinental ballistic missiles. Or by using aircraft. The Tu-160. But probably also Tu-95. It can act as an airborne launching platform. 

The biggest problem with defense against the Burevestnik missile is. The missile’s nuclear reactor. 

If that miniature reactor breaks, the system will spread its radioactive components to the atmosphere and ground. The Burevestnik is only one of the new weapons that Russia is developing. And maybe there will be something more interesting. Maybe the Russians are planning. To make a nuclear-powered version of the Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack bomber. And those systems are more frightening than the Burevestnik missile can ever be. Nuclear-powered shuttles can travel between Earth and the Moon, and they can also make interstellar travel possible. The Burevestnik missile. It is one of the examples. This introduces the world to what Putin’s biggest advantages are.

"A screenshot shows testing of the Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile, taken from a Russian Defense Ministry video released in 2018. Russian Ministry of Defense" (EurAsianTimes, 

If we compare his position to the West. There were nuclear-powered missile projects in the 1950s and 1960s. Same way. They were tested. Nuclear-powered aircraft like the nuclear-powered Tu-95LAL. The nuclear-powered variant of the Tu-95 “Bear” and nuclear-powered NB-36 bomber, which was the nuclear-powered variant of the B-36”Peacemaker. The Project Pluto. Or SLAM (Supersonic, Low-Flying missile). It was one of the most advanced systems that was developed. The SLAM missile could leave the pollution line behind it in the atmosphere. That caused the risk. Of large-scale pollution. In some variants, the system could use hydrogen as the propellant. 

Hydrogen will not become highly radioactive even if it travels through the reactor. The Burevestnik uses a compressor system that separates the nuclear fuel from the air. But it is also possible that this missile has an attack mode that turns the nuclear reactor into a Ramjet engine. The iris can close the airflow from the compressor, and then the system starts to deliver air into the reactor. From some other vents. This means that. The Burevestnik can have. Cruise and attack modes. 

The SLAM and other nuclear-powered rocket projects were terminated because of public pressure. The attitude against nuclear weapons and nuclear power was very resistant. People are afraid of pollution. And that was the reason why those promising systems terminated in the West. But people like Putin must not care about public opinion. The Burevestnik, or Skyfall missile. Uses more modern technology. And that means this kind of weapon has a very big potential to create nuclear-powered shuttles and other nuclear systems. 

https://defence-industry.eu/russia-confirms-successful-test-of-nuclear-powered-nuclear-armed-burevestnik-cruise-missile/

https://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/slam.html

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/russia-tests-new-nuclear-powered-burevestnik-cruise-missile/articleshow/124824724.cms

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/russia-fires-worlds-1st-nuke-powered-cruise-missile-burevestnik/

https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/russias-mach-2-tu-160-blackjack-bomber-fastest-and-heaviest-on-earth/

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/what-is-russias-burevestnik-missile-2025-10-26/

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/russia-tested-new-nuclear-powered-cruise-missile-top-general-says-2025-10-26/

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/russia-central-asia/article/3330366/putin-russias-new-nuclear-powered-missile-can-evade-any-defence

https://united24media.com/latest-news/russia-tests-unlimitedrange-burevestnik-nuclear-missile-heres-what-we-know-12821

https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/ltv-slam-project-pluto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9M730_Burevestnik

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_B-36_Peacemaker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_NB-36H

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersonic_Low_Altitude_Missile

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95LAL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-160

 

Gyrojet pistols and rifles -the attempt to make rocket projectile for handguns

13 mm. Gyrojet pistol
Picture I

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/gyrojet-pistols-and-rifles-attempt-to.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Gyrojet pistols and rifles were created in 1960's for using the rocket ammunition. The orderer of that unique weapon was United States military and the use of rocket ammunition would eliminate the shell of the cartridge, and that could cover the shooting point, what would give the dogs smell of those soldiers. The Gyrojet-weapons were meant for special forces, what would have troubles with the shells. The ammunition would accelerate after leaving the barrel, and that would make those weapons very effective.


One of the reasons for creating this weapon was the idea, that by using rocket ammunition would the pistol and rifle have the same firepower, and also the solution, where the same weapon fits all purposes would be attractive. In some solutions, the gyrojet would equip with the extended barrel and the removable stock, what would give the same accuracy to that gun, as the rifle has. This would remove the need for two guns and ammunition, what makes loading the gun easier. And because the same weapon fits different missions it would be suitable for special forces operators, who spent weeks behind the enemy lines.



And if the weapon should carry as the sidearm and sort range purposes, those extended barrels and stocks could be removed. This Gyrojet solution was the fiasco, as you might know, and the manufacturing of this weapon stopped in 1960's. But after that have been rumors, that military forces have tested Gyrojet-type rocket bullets, what are loaded with the standard ammunition. In this solution, the rocket ammunition would be used with standard assault rifles.



The diameter of that rocket would be same as the bullet, and when the assault rifle would be launched, the shell would be thrown away as the standard ammunition. The rocket ammunition would give more sensitive acceleration for ammunition, and that would make it suitable for smart bullets. Those bullets are actually miniature missiles, what would home to target with the miniature computer. And the aiming for those bullets happens with lasers. The structure of those smart bullets are the same as guided "Copperhead" ammunition, but they are smaller. That ammunition is planned to use in the positions like hostage rescue and anti-sniper operations. In those cases, the nano-robot would mark the target with the laser ray, and then the ammunition will take the target off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet

Film I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJAXpyt8-oQ

Film II

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdW8Trh_MGg&t=46s


Picture I

https://modernfirearms.net/userfiles/images/handguns/usa/1/1287739508.jpg

Next generation of military submarines is entering the service

(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/next-generation-of-military-submarines.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The next generation of missile submarines have extremely high precision strike capacity, and those submarines can be equipped with hypersonic cruise missiles. Here I'm writing about both sides the United States Navy's and the Russian Navy's new equipment, what is developing on both sides of the new cold war. And also China would be interested in those systems, what have many capabilities to destroy enemy's sea or land targets with surgical strikes. Those weapons are fully automatized, and they can operate without the crew years at the sea, without coming to the base, and they are the most dangerous military systems, what have ever developed.


In these scenarios, the ballistic missiles like Trident D-5 or SS-N-20 "Seahawk" would be equipped with the aerodynamic warheads or scramjet engined cruise missiles, what can fly straight to target with speed over Mach 6. Those missiles are very hard to intercept, and the warning time would be extremely short. They can be equipped with STEALTH-technology or active DEW (Directed Energy Weapon) system, what mission is to destroy or disturb the anti-aircraft missiles, what are shooting against those incoming hypersonic cruise missiles.


That very high-speed equipment would destroy the target by using kinetic energy, and its survivability for attack can be increased by installing the RATO-system, what gives electricity to the magnetrons, what can create very powerful microwave signals to those targets. That system could damage the mission-critical systems of the targetted vessel. In this case, the microwave transmitter's mission would destroy enemy electronics equipment and give extreme heat to the hull of the targeted vessel or supply dump.


This system would not close the existence of thermonuclear warhead, and the microwave systems mission would be helping the missile to survive the counter missiles, and the microwave would plow the enemy anti-aircraft missiles away from the route of attacking missile. Those new submarines would have many technical advantages, like the capacity to patrol without the crew. So those next-generation missile submarines can patrol in the deepest seas years without coming to the base. If the crew is necessary, those men can transfer to the submarine by the hull of the support vessel. And the submarine itself stays unseen.


The crew transfer can also be used for another submarine, and in this might be one purpose to build the "Uniform class" nuclear-propelled midget submarines. Drone submarines can patrol at sea, and be waiting for orders to begin the operation against enemies, but sometimes those vessels need service and that's why the service crew must sometimes visit in those submarines, what can be patrolling in the secret locations, and wait for orders to open fire with missiles, or start to hunt enemy submarines and surface battle units.

Sources:

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2018/06/01/russia-has-plans-for-its-future-nuclear-subs-and-it-involves-hypersonic-missiles/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DFN+DNR+6%2F1%2F18&utm_term=Editorial+-+Daily+News+Roundup

Picture I

https://i0.wp.com/todiscoverrussia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Typhoon-Class-Submarine1.jpg?resize=1489%2C1000

About Russian hypersonic missile and strengths and weaknesses about hypersonic cruise missiles

(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Russia has said, that it would have the new hypersonic missile, what can knock out any U.S Carrier from the sea. This concept is not actually very new, and the beginning of this weapon is in the early 90's when the Soviet Union collapsed. In that time engineers worked with the new type of weapon, what based on the ramjet-propellant hybrid missile, that could avoid U.S air defense. Hypersonic missiles have many strangenesses but also weaknesses, and one of those weaknesses is that those missiles cannot make many curves, what makes probably possible to calculate their flight route and the target, and the heating of the nose can also allow targeting the missile with infrared systems. This can help the target to predict the attack, and send the anti-aircraft missiles against those hypersonic weapons.


The weapon was meant for a shoot to ballistic trajectory by using conventional ICBM missile like SS-19 or it's the first stage, and then the missile would dive in the atmosphere. After or during the dive, the fuel would be injected to the ramjet engine, and then the cruise missile could start to fly to its target in the speed of Mach 6 or more, and that very high speed would make the defense against that missile very difficult, and those missiles would be very big threat for any target in enemy territory.


Those cruise missiles would seem the little bit like SS-N-21, but they must be more aerodynamic than SS-N-21. Those missiles would be devastating even without the warhead, and if they would attack against carrier fleet, would the level of kinetic energy be very high, if that kind of missile hits the ship. But of course, that kind of cruise missiles can carry the conventional or nuclear warhead. The problem of the warhead is that very high speed of the weapon would make the timing of detonator quite difficult, because if the warhead detonates in the different time, would the armored nuclear command bunkers survive the attack.  The modern computer technology makes those missiles more deadly than ever before.


Modern computers allow the missile to change it's course and speed all the time, and also image identification system allows them to attack sharply than ever before. Those systems bases that the photograph of the target is installed in the memory of the computer, and then the camera takes the picture, what is compiling with the picture that is saved in the memory of the computer. When those pictures are perfectly in one on the other, the weapon attack straight to the target. Hypersonic cruise missiles are very difficult for defenders because they are extremely high-speed targets, what can fly in low level.


There is, of course, one weakness about those weapons. That is that their nose would be heated in very high temperature and that infrared signature can be used to aim anti-aircraft weapons to those targets. The most effective weapons, what can be used against those hypersonic cruise missiles could be DEW:s (Directed Energy Weapons) like lasers, what can aim to target by using infrared cameras. And if there would be creating the hole in the nose of that missile, would that cause the situation, that the hypersonic weapon would be destroyed before it hits the target. But that needs the direct hit to the missile. The speed of hypersonic cruise missile causes, that if any projectile hits it, by flying straight to the nose of that weapon, that would destroy the hypersonic missile by very high-level impact power. And those high-speed missiles cannot turn very tight curves, what could be possible to calculate the point, where that missile would fly, what might make defense possible.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M22_Zircon

https://www.unilad.co.uk/technology/russia-confirms-its-6000mph-hypersonic-missile-is-ready-for-war/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-tests-hypersonic-missile-kinzhal-vladimir-putin-nuclear-weapons-donald-trump-a8250796.html


Picture I

https://www.neweurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/01_Zicron.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Lockheed XQM-60 "Kingfisher" the early version of hypersonic cruise missiles

Lockheed XQM-60 "Kingfisher"
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lockheed-xqm-60-kingfisher-early.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I found an article at Internet or Wikipedia, where was told a story of XQM-60 "Kingfisher" target drone, what had the capacity to speed of mach 4,3. This ramjet- propelled drone was in operational in 1951, and this thing was meant that the United States Air Force had the capacity to make hypersonic cruise missiles in 1950's.


In this drone had the same capacity to strike targets than some Tomahawk cruise missile. This kind of drones was officially made for anti-ballistic missile simulations, but there are so many details in this drones history, that I think the real purpose of that project was creating the very fast missile, what had the capacity to destroy targets by using kinetic energy. That means that "Kingfisher" might use as the model to create those extreme powerful missiles, what have the capacity to destroy specific targets in the enemy ground.


When we are looking at the United States reactions for China and Russian attempt to create those weapons, we must consider that the USA doesn't say anything about this kind of things. But when we are thinking about the procedures of the military forces way to give information, we must consider that they would give only the information, what is necessary to give. This means that the first hypersonic cruise missiles might fly in 1960's in the nose of some Nike-Hercules rocket. But this is only the thoughts about this drone.


We must remember that also "Tomahawk"-cruise missile started its career as the BQM-109 target drone, and when this drone was equipped with the nuclear warhead, it became BGM-109 "Tomahawk", what is the primary long-range weapon in the United States Navy. And maybe the name "Kingfisher" was meant to warn the enemies of United States, that this drone can drive to impact the enemy warships and bunkers. And the kinetic energy would destroy that target without warning if the nose of the missile would use Stealth technology for avoiding the radar of the targeted warship. Also, active ECM-system might be used to make sure that the missile would hit the target.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_AQM-60_Kingfisher

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ea/Aqm-60a.jpg/300px-Aqm-60a.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lockheed-xqm-60-kingfisher-early.html

Could the chemical strike to Douma caused by the malfunction of FAE-bombs?

 Kimmo Huosionmaa


There is one link below the text, and there you might see the thing what is very problematic in the use of chemical weapons. In Douma, the used chemical agent was claimed to be Chlorine, what is actually stifling chemical, and the base purpose if use that chemical is the Chlorine just pulls air away, and it would stifle the persons, who are in the targeted area. If the Chlorine is in drip formation or it is used very large amount, could it sterilize the victim's skin, and that situation is very dangerous.


In that case, the mushrooms and bacteria would cause very dangerous skin infections. In the chemical warfare normally the Chlorine causes similar death than carbon monoxide, and the symptoms are similar than normal loss of oxygen. But in Douma case, the dust, what raises from the ground can cause choke of the victims, and the Chlorine is also sometimes used in thermobaric explosives, what are normally known as FAE (Fuel Air Explosives) or aerosol bombs.


The USA, Russia and many other countries have large numbers of those weapons in their arsenal. And the first time they were used in large numbers or they came to public knowledge was Vietnam war, where they were used by A-1 "Skyraiders" against Viet-Cong troops.  After that those weapons are installed also in fast tactical airplanes.


Russia has been created also portable FAE-ammunition, what can shoot to target by using RPG-7 bazookas and other portable weapons like rifle mounted grenade launchers. I don't know does USA use similar portable FAE-weapon systems. But in Vietnam was also used portable acetylene bottles, what could be used against Viet-Cong tunnels, but were they in operational use is not reported.


Are some of those weapons does not explode, the Chlorine would deliver to the area like in the normal chemical attack. In this case, the malfunction of legal ammunition can cause the effect of the chemical attack. In aerosol bombs, the bomb delivers some high inflammable gas to air, and then the small detonator causes the ignition in that cloud, what can explode with the power of the small nuclear weapon.


The used chemical in this kind of weapons is normally some hydrocarbon, but also Chlorine is very usable for that purpose. That gas is very reactive, and it makes very good explosion effect. One reason for losing oxygen from the air could be the use of FAE-bombs, what causes the loss of oxygen because those ammunition uses the oxygen from the air to burn. Also, the large goal of napalm has the same effect.


The easiest way to make FAE-ammunition is to fill the canister with hydrocarbon or halogen gas like chlorine and drop them to targets with napalm bombs. And the napalm is sometimes used with that kind of  FAE-bombs because that makes sure that those weapons would explode. Normally FAE-bombs are used because of their pressure effect, what is sharper than splinter bombs. That's one reason, why FAE bombs are sometimes wanted to classification as "inhumane weapons".

Sources:

https://www.kansalainen.fi/syyrian-douman-kaasuiskun-totuutta-etsimassa/

FAE-Bomb test

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmRASCHJe2Q

Russian FAE in Syria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFpIiRxQgDQ

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/could-chemical-strike-to-douma-caused.html

Russian naval exercise began in the coast of Sweden

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/

What do you expect that Russia says when the missile hits airfield of its ally?

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/what-do-you-expect-that-russia-says-when-the-missile-hits-airfield-of-its-ally/

Complex political triangle in the international politics, authoritarian governments, great natural resources and nuclear weapons

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Most of the wars are reasons the economic conditions.The war of natural resources was also Hitler excuse for Barbarossa. And before that for the attack to Poland.Lebensraum was the excuse for the attack to Poland. But real reasons were the oil of Bessarabia. For that object must German army open the door to the Soviet Union. And the German people were told that those attacks are caused by the need to connect those areas, where was living German people in Germany. If the oil fields would be attacked by nuclear weapons, what would use against troops what are fighting in that area, would the destruction be very total, the troops that are serving in that area would be eliminated, but the infrastructure would also be destroyed. That would because many problems when the oil production would be restarted. Those problems would be that this area is polluted by radioactive material, and also the oil production systems what have been in that area should rebuild.


Those nations that are targeted to strike have many times dictatorship or the authoritarian way to control the people in their model of leading the state. The situation of the political leadership, the model of leading the nation is not so simple as people normally thinks. Many people ask why those governments would not be fallen by military forces, but those actions would make many deaths in those areas. And of course the western pilots and other military personnel, who operates in that are are always in danger. If the nuclear weapons are used in those countries, would those weapons sweep the opposing military forces out of the area, but those weapons would also destroy the oil refineries from those areas.


Dictatorship is the model of the state in many nations, what have very much natural resources. And that makes them perfect target for military actions, but also we must remember that those countries are independent nations, and the great natural resources of their area are always causing the problems because those national leaders can choose their own supporters. The problem of those authoritarian leaders of the nation is that those governments are actually confessed in United Nations.


And this makes the situation very difficult and complex. Those nations the social and economic differences are very strong. And some cases normal person, who lives in those countries cannot even write their own name. And the only book, what they have ever kept in their hands is Koran. That makes those people very good target for provocateurs, who would promise them the place in paradise if they would join terrorist groups.


The problem with dictatorship is that those nations have no opposite force for their leaders, who would not get information of the consequence of their orders. Or they would get information, what involves only positive things about their decisions. They would not see the other side of their orders, what could cause something, what they won't even think. If the maker for decision would not see every side of the thing, the decision would be someway unthinkable.


Every leader of the nation needs the opposition, that those leaders see another part of the problem, what might be more complex than the rulers ever thought. Then we are thinking of the situation when the Soviet Union was a collapse, the world was tuned right. There was not socialism anymore, and workers were lost their supporter, was the message, what was told to people. When we are starting to think the opinions of the working people, they would not get support from the Soviet Union as much as people thought. The reason for turning right was that the fear of the Soviet Union was dammed many things in the society to the left wing, and in rumors, every mayday parade was caused by the Soviet Union.


The laws changed to right, and the society works like some kind of water. When people would transfer the water to another side of the pool,  there would be a giant wave. The collapse of the Soviet Union released the wave, what fell to the right side of society. In that time the socialism was fallen, and this thing caused the social room, where the only real ideology was marketing economy. That thing caused the situation, where nobody had power in parliament to say nothing against the right wing laws, what was not very well organized.


Because opposition was weak, there would be no reason to listen to their opinions. Many persons believe, that left-wing opposition presenters were protected by Soviet nuclear weapons. Why the government should ever hear other opinions of the laws, what it has right to adjust? In that situation, many people saw, that opposition was led by the Soviet Union, and when that supporter was left, there were no reasons to listen to opposition arguments. Now we can see the results of that kind of politics. In that time the Soviet Union was gone in history. There was not the boogeyman for media, what would use as the silencer. There was an intuition, that nothing was allowed to say against the Soviet Union, because if the leaders of that country would start nuclear attack immediately if some writings don’t support it.


This is left the very bad thing in our political commonwealth. The fear of nuclear strike has given us the journals, where is sometimes glamorize the Russian nuclear arsenal. That arsenal is of course very large, but in those writings the only thing, what is mentioned is that Russia has the world's largest Nuclear weapons, and that’s it. If the leaders of that nation would not like the writings, it would use its nukes immediately. And this is very short-term way of thinking. The war is the cause of the economic situation or attempts to get economic advantages of those areas.


And if somebody would use nuclear weapons against the targeted country, the results would be, that all infrastructure of that nation would be destroyed. In this case, the nuclear weapons would cause the situation, that all cities of the opponent are rumbled to dust. Also, large land areas would be polluted, and that causes that the nuclear weapons make those land areas dangerous to use. The cleaning of those areas would take very long period, and the economy of that area would be the break. So the financial advantages could be very small from those areas where nuclear weapons have been used. So this limits sometimes the will of using those ultimate weapons against some nations.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/complex-political-triangle-in.html

About situation in Ukraine

7K720 Iskander missile
(NATO SS-26 "Stone")
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vladimir Putin and the situation in Ukraine are not been very often in a stand at public media. Reason for that is there is nothing going on in that place, what is called as the Crimean peninsula. This place is in very important strategic location when we are thinking about a transportation of Caucasian oil and gas by tubes to European markets. If the Caucasian oil and gas will replace Russian products, that would mean the decrease of Russians economic and political influence. And in the real world, that means that Russia cannot cut those deliveries for having political acceptance for other actions. If the nation doesn't use Russian oil and gas, the threat would give only by the military forces. And it looks like bad in the international politics. Open threading by weapons will cause the public opinion turn against Russia.

And there have been ideas of massive United Nations peacekeeping operations in Ukraine, but the reason of Russian military power the passion for this kind of operations is much lower than in Afghanistan and Iraq. Russian nuclear force is the very frightening thing, what will make think twice, if somebody wants to operate in Ukraine with United Nations mandate. Russian interest is that situation in Ukraine will forget as fas as possible. Also, many European countries will want to normalize their relationship with Russian leaders.


If we think that the USA would come in this situation with military forces, we must say, that this scenario is very improbable, because this nation has been in the war since 2001, and that would be not very good for the reputation of that country. The prize of that war is very high, and the operation in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost more than the Second World War. Also, the losses of human lives in those wars have been very high, and the people of USA have tired about the war.


The war between the USA and Russia would be the World War III, what might mean nuclear holocaust, where the big part of the human population will be killed. This is the reason, why the solution to this problem is not able to find the military way. The problem with this crisis is that Russian military has got power to stand in that area, and those troops are highly protected by nuclear weapons, what has installed on highly mobile battlefield systems warships.


Those weapons are extremely difficult to detect, and they have the capacity to destroy the entire city. If those truck-mounted weapons would detect, they are quite easy to destroy by tactical fighters, helicopters or commando-strike. But the detection is the problem. The weapon itself can be destroyed by anti-tank weapons or bombs. If the core of the bomb will be broken, radioactive plutonium will be delivered to the ground.  But of course, nuclear weapons have the very hard defense and strikes can be shielded by the security-fire by the security team. So this makes those weapons extreme difficult targets for military forces. The system goes, that tactical nuclear weapons will be used in the first strike, and those weapons are supported by strategic nuclear weapons And if Russian conventional forces would get in trouble those weapons will be used in this kind of situation.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander

Picture 1
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLGxFjm2f_Q1B794FLy3bk9rbb5tBXSPfDpZFFLlDs_S8lpHxlww

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-situation-in-ukraine.html

Aquajet and the new way to make drones, what is capable even for nuclear strike

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/aquajet-and-new-way-to-make-drones-what.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/aquajet-and-new-way-to-make-drones-what.html

The new Russian 100 megatons nuclear weapon is the horrifying thing.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-new-russian-100-megatons-nuclear.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-new-russian-100-megatons-nuclear.html