The fire ants can give ideas for swarming robots.

The ants and other swarm operating bugs are used as models for swarming robots. When we think of the independently operating drone swarms controlled by artificial intelligence. Those systems did not exist 10 years ago. Even the small-size quadcopters and other drones can operate as a swarm. 

The nuclear-powered drone swarms can operate in the atmosphere of other planets. They can operate underwater conditions in the Marianna Trench. And the icy oceans in the Jupiter and Saturn icy moons. But they can also be new and powerful tools on the battlefields. 

The thing that makes this thing possible is the network-based system called "distributed calculation". Developers created this system for making animations for computers. The idea is that the computers can share their capacity and resources with other computers. 

The network-based system allows making the drone swarm. That can connect data that their sensors are delivering. The drones can stay on their operational area as the plate. When one of those systems is seeing something interesting. It shares that data with all others. 

Small-size quadcopters might have only one or two sensors like regular CCD, infrared, or some kind of radars. The quadcopter can also carry seismic or acoustic sensors. That means those drones can lay to the ground and feel the seismic oscillations. 

Those systems can also eavesdrop on enemy speech. The quadcopter can also have chemical detectors that allow them to find the ammunition or fuel dump. The thing is that the large numbers of those swarming robots are replacing the quality. 

It's possible that in the future. There are three types of aerial systems. Or actually, those systems already exist. 

1) Simple, one mission drones

2) Multimission drones

3) Manned systems

Those systems are integrated as an entirety. The network-based systems allow sharing the information between components of the military systems. The aerial systems are also integrated to the part of the entirety where the sea and land troops are also participating in the network-based battlefields. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

The hierarchy of aerial systems can be like this:

1) The simple, and cheap one mission drones. That is pulling missile fire away from the more complicated systems. Those drones can also be used as miniaturized killer robots. Those quadcopter-looking systems or loitering ammunition called "kamikaze drones" are the systems. 

Those terrorists are using most probably. The problem with those systems is that they are thought of as cruise missiles that are making more curves than normal cruise missiles. 

2) Multi-purpose drones can be remotely controlled systems. Or independent operating AI-driven systems. Those systems can use as remote-controlled or independently operating attack aircraft. 

Or they can have the internal warhead. They can operate alone or with manned aircraft. The loyal wingman drone's mission is to pull the missile fire away from the manned aircraft or attack against missile stations. 

The drones can also make the plate under their aircraft makes more difficult to shoot them down. The quadcopters can have infrared lights that give masks for stealth fighters.  

And they can spray iron powder into the air making it difficult to see the stealth aircraft. That is behind those drones. The stealth fighter can make the strikes by using satellite-guided weapons. 

3) The manned aircraft.  The loyal wingmen drones can be used as "kamikaze drones" or remote-controlled auxiliary jet fighters. The controller of those drones can sit on the back seat of the stealth fighter. Those drones can share their data between the computers of the jet fighters.

But they can also be 1000 kilometers away in the command centers. That thing might not be very sportsmanlike. But also in the Spartan army, the idea was that if somebody attacked one Spartan, the another would hit that attacker to back by using the spear. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

Social bugs like ants are giving data on how the system should operate as swarms. The swarming robots can close the route of the jet fighters. And the thing that makes them more powerful than regular sensors is that those quadcopters can fly in jet engines. 

When we are thinking the technology behind those quadcopters is that the individual member of the drone swarms must not be versatile. The entirety is versatile because those quadcopters or other types of drones might have different types of sensors. 

The drone swarms are complicated things. They can produce at the combat zone by using 3D printers and automatized manufacturing platforms. Those systems can detect things like missiles in seconds if they are in position. Drones can deliver from satellites and the thing is that those systems can assassinate individual persons. 

In those systems, the image recognition system will locate the target. And the small drone will drop from the satellite. The heat core denies the burning of that system. The quadcopter can be equipped with a regular pistol that makes it a very suitable and dangerous system in the wrong hands. 

Drones are effective in conflicts. They can make sudden attacks from the sky by using smart weapons. This thing makes them feared and brutal systems. But the defenders of the drone attacks are saying that the purpose of weapons is to fear enemies. Some people are saying that drones are easy to shoot down. 

Or they are easy to affect. If we think that the drone that costs the same price as some car hits by a missile that price is over a million euros that thing can be acceptable. One of the purposes of drone swarms is to pull missile fire to them away from the complicated manned aircraft and drones. 

But when we are thinking about the situation in Ukraine where are no swarming drones we must ask one interesting question. If drones are easy to destroy or jam. 

Why don't the Russians destroy those drones? Why do they allow the Turkish-build drones to fly around their vehicles, and destroy them? That is one interesting thing to think about. 

https://phys.org/news/2022-03-physics-ant-rafts-swarming-robots.html

https://interestandinnovation.blogspot.com/

The "Skinwalker ranch" part II (Is this place the robot test site?)

Steam horse from 19th century
(Picture I)

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Could somebody force the owners of that famous ranch leaving the area by using electric arcs and another kind of stuff? And did they make that thing for covering something, what people should not see? When we are thinking about the poltergeist, what was the description in the film, what is below the text, we must see, that those phenomena are very easy to make by using electric arcs, fireworks, and loudspeakers. The name of the ranch feels like something psychological operation.


So were Shermans the victims of "Project Garnet". The pseudo-UFO-project, what government uses to turn the attention from otherwise, when it wants to hide something, and in that project is made the high power electric systems, holographic equipment, airships, and other things, what are made look like UFO:s. But as we might see, there is something very interesting in the films, what is made by that case. The film is not made by me, and I don't own copyrights, but there are a couple of interesting parts.


In the 2:02 is the art, what seems very interesting, and the left figure might seem like the horse, what is hit by the rocket. And the left side of thing looks like a horse, what has some kind of hilts. Or maybe they are the fuel tanks for some kind of mechanical horse. We know that in 19th. century was made the mechanic humans, and horses, what were called as "automaton". So could that kind of technology tested in that ranch? The picture in 2:06 seems like painted while LSD trip, and this is very interesting. And in my mind came one very interesting thought, could that ranch be used for testing undercover intelligence or military surveillance robots?

The intelligence and military are , of course, interesting many kinds of robots, and some robots, what could be developed for surveillance might seem innocent, and probably intelligence would be tested also artificial cows, what could be equipped with composts, what creates the methane for the fuel cells of that device. I know this feels futuristic, but the robot, what could look for fuel from nature would be hard to detect and own more operational time, than robots what tank must refill. Or if the robot can drink the hydrocarbons like an animal, would that help to keep those things secret.

Even in 19th. century the automatons or robots, as we call those things today were seriously investigated and tested, but the technology was not enough high level for making those early robots suitable for the everyday purpose. But as we know the modern technology allows us to make even artificial cows, what eats the real food like, and that biomass can be transformed as an alcohol or methane in the anaerobic reactor, and use in fuel cells, what gives power for that kind of robots. Those robot animals can be equipped with machine guns and anti-tank weapons, and if we want to be nasty, those artificial cows can also be equipped with nuclear explosives. That kind of solutions is interesting many organizations and offices in the world of intelligence and military.

The film of "Skinwalker's ranch"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b3hu_zNs2o

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_robots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mephisto_(automaton)


Picture 1
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/steam-horse.jpeg

Thoughts about investigations and clouds

Picture I

https://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/


Kimmo Huosionmaa


This is only the imagination but on the top of the text is the picture of three cloud towers (Picture I), what brings in my mind the Eagle nebula, where is also three towers. I know that there are people, who start to think that I'm crazy, but there is the very distant similarity between the shapes of those three clouds and the interplanetary fog in the Eagle nebula (Picture II). Of course, that seems the little bit too revolutionary way to see objects. But the clouds are incredible. And maybe somebody would see the similarity. And as I just wrote, use your imagination, and believe that the similarity is true.


They are so unique and same time so fantastic, that I must sometimes use my imagination, and see the things in those forms, what other people are not probably seeing. But the imagination is the good tool to make art and other illustrations. When the art investigators send their photos or drawings in the art magazines, they followed, what photograph was not liked, and then they looked at the feedback. If somebody gives bad feedback, don't worry be happy.

Picture II
Eagle nebula
(Image by NASA)

That told the graphologist, what was wrong with those pictures. If some feedback was very bad, they started to look for, what was the reason for that bad way to make contact. Was the reason that the person, who sent that feedback, wanted that the artist or graphologist would end the work, what this person does? And why that thing was wanted? What's the problem with photographs and art? Is there something in those photographs, what those people don't want to show to the world.

Picture III

If somebody misunderstands the third picture cloud as the UFO or aircraft in the dark evening, that would not be the reason for threat somebody. So don't be so serious with those misunderstandings. If some person makes lots of work, that means, that there is also misunderstandings. We all make mistakes. And if somebody doesn't do anything, that means that this person cannot make mistakes. We are all humans and we sometimes believe that some clouds are aircraft if we see those shapes in the dark evening, just before the sunset.

Silkhenge spiders and boosting the intelligence of animals

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/silkhenge-spiders-and-boosting.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above this text, you might see the mysterious creature, what is made for one spider. That structure is very abnormal, and it brought my mind the tests, where the animals are used for tests of Alzheimer-medicals or something like that. When I'm looking at this structure, I'd like to know what makes the spider make it? Have this spiders predisposes the stuff like Alzheimer medicals, what makes them behave strange way?


There are horror movies, where the sharks have eaten that kind of chemicals and became more intelligent as the normal sharks. I know that this might feel very utopistic, but there are rumors that in some tests to the ant's worms were injected extra neurons, what might make those ants more intelligent than normal ants. The reason, why those scientists chose ants for that process, is that they are not dangerous if there are only two or three individuals. If some spider would become extremely intelligent in compilation for the other individuals, that would cause the real-life "Arachnophobia" situation. But this is the only hypothesis. We would not know how the increase of the intelligence would influent those spiders behavior.


And those scientists tested the reactions of those ants, and their skills to survive against other ants. But in some cases, those tests might make by using spiders. This test might have consisted of the neuron transfer and Alzheimer medical predispose, what might make those spiders more intelligent than the spiders are. Is the spider or ant more intelligent than normal after the neuron transparent consists, if the transferred neuron can live in the new body and can it connect the nervous system?


If it could do that,  the animal would have more neurons than the normal individual. So, in this case, we are talking about very small animals like bugs and spiders, what have normally only about ten neurons. And increasing the number of those cells by two causes 20 percent increase the number of neurons. And if those neurons would work perfectly, they would become the part of that organism nervous system. That would make those things more intelligent than other individuals.


When we are thinking about this kind of tests and experiments, where the level of intelligence would be raised by giving the animal the Alzheimer medication or transferring the neurons, we must think that this kind of investigations is somehow dangerous. If the intelligence level of the sharks would increase, their behavior might be changed, and they can be more dangerous for swimmers than normal sharks. The increasing of intelligence means that behavior of the individual would change.


And when this kind of tests, where the bugs would be prone to that kind of medicals are made, should the maker of those tests be sure that those bugs would not get in nature. Bugs are very nice objects for that kind in investigations, where the team investigates the influence of medical on the nervous system because they are living only short time. Also, they are small sized, and if they are not poisonous, they are no threat to the human. The chemicals would not influence to genomes, and that's why the mutation would not transfer to next generation.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZgD7xKjaoQ

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Unc-g9AHl2Y/sddefault.jpg#404_is_fine

The hardest material in the universe

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-hardest-material-in-universe.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-hardest-material-in-universe.html