Nowadays the way to make politics is different than yesterday

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Now Donald Trump has been commented the internal politics of Great Britain, and that is giving the signal that something has been changed in that area. Donald Trump is not the only president, who have made comments about other nations internal politics, but this is the new way to make politics. The thing is that the traditional way, where only the "political elite" can talk about things is changing. And that gives new kind of demands for politicians. They must follow social media and take notice of their behavior because if they screw up, there will be nobody, who could fix that mistake.


Trump is the man, who came to the political elite from the business world, and that makes him different than what has been seen in the seat of the statesman or leader of the state. And there is one thing what has been forgotten about Trump. This man has been got very much negative publicity during the election campaign for the presidency and that campaign is also mentioned in the foreign press.


Many European leaders wanted that there would be somebody else than Trump in the White House, but then the people of the USA gave their votes. And the catastrophe was ready. Trump was elected for the President Of the United States Of America against the will of the foreign countries. This is, of course, the little bit embarrassing for the people, who gave open support to the competitor of Trump.


Those people must now meet this man, and he might remember how some pressmen argumentation his personality. The argumentation and blasphemous attitude for this man was very embarrassing because those writers must now tolerate Trump, and the worst thing is, that this man raised in the seat of the President Of United States Of America because of those media-stories. Without those articles, Trump might lose the race, and there might be somebody else in the White House. But as we know the international campaign against Trump was raised this man as the position, where he is now.


When we are talking about the position of Trump, this man is trying to create something else than militaristic peace. And when we are thinking about this meeting at Helsinki, we must realize that there is two way to make peace. Another one is to talk with another part, or make more nuclear weapons. And nuclear weapons are very expensive tools, what might deny many open conflicts, but as we know, this is only the speculation.


The nuclear policy and security have been created by the top scientists for the military powers of the nations, what have nuclear weapons. And here is one thing, what people always forget. USA and Russia are not only states, what have nuclear weapons. That makes the nuclear disarming a very complicated thing. Israel, China, India, and Pakistan are also nuclear states with North-Korea do we want that or not.


And South-Africa can make own nuke when this country wants to return it nuclear strike capacity. Here I listed the states, what are not members of any defense coalitions. Of course, we have almost forgotten the Nuclear weapons of France and the United Kingdom. Even if Russia and the USA would make contracts about nuclear disarming there are also other nations, what should come to talk about those weapons, what are treat for Russia.


This is the reason, why those things are very complicated. Trump is not the only one who has made mistakes, but he is now the president, who has power in his country. This is the fact, what we must confess. There would be no new elections before the next campaign in the year 2020, and then Trump can continue from the year 2121 to the year 2125 as the President Of the United States if the people of USA think he is the right man to lead that country.

About writing and personal freedoms

Mediaeval writer

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-writing-and-personal-freedoms.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

It would be very tough to make every writing by using the scientific methodology. Sometimes people tell, that the sources of the texts are badly marked, or something that people write is actually the hoax. But when we are thinking about sources, are the museums the sources, what can be thought as trustable. Is the Museum of technology in Vienna the source, what can be trusted? If we are thinking about the proofs of the things, we must say, that when we are looking at the crop images, we are normally mean the complicated pictures, what are made by pushing the crop to the state where the crop has been flattened. Making those images is quite easy.


There are three ways to make them with modern technology.  The first one is using the quadrocopter and GPS, and if the nano helicopter is equipped with the powerful compressor, what would blow the water or hydrocarbon to crop, it would make the image quite easily. But if the used stuff were water, the crop would be wet, and hydrocarbon is actually expensive. Another way is to use two helicopters, where another flies higher, and then the lower one would make the pictures. The controller of the lower helicopter must be sharp, that the picture would be, what this person wants.


The third one would need technology, what is very difficult to get. It is to use the Schwarm of the nano- or robot bugs, what are acting as one entirety. This would need complicated technology and that system is difficult to create because there are many quadrocopters, what must be paid. The quadrocopters would be equipped with RFID component, and the central computer would control them with multi-channel radio, what gives every part of the swarm individual orders. Or if the maker would have the "wise drones", that swarm can operate independently. It would be enough that one particle of the group of the robots would get the orders, what to do, and then it would send the orders to other members of the swarm. But those drones are actually difficult to buy because they are sometimes military secret. And of course, the prize of those drones is very high. And that's why I must ask "why somebody would want to do that?" Are those crop pictures really made for fun, or are those pictures result for some kind of control tests, where were tested the capacities and controls of drone swarms?


If we are thinking about image manipulation or something like that, we might say that the faker of the image is somebody else than us. Then somebody writes something, must this person give room for personal opinions and thoughts. Personal thinking is not a crime, and also bringing own personality in the text is also allowed, and when we are thinking about the newspapers or some other media, there is of course sometimes need to release the space in the magazines for something very important thing.


The thing is the big international meeting in our country, and then is the best way to keep the mouth shut up because there are more important things to think that some "Sentinel family". There is better that nobody says against the official mention, and the comments can be let to official reporters.  But I don't understand what those newspapers write in the rest of the year. And if some writings have no meanings, why in the newspapers are some writings against the writers, who would write something against the political elite. When are we thinking about the spam, who cares about it? If some writing is meanless, why giving the comments against it?


When we are looking at the writings, many writers would connect them in the very tight role, and that makes writing very hard. Looking for sources all the time makes writing very difficult, and this process should be easy and light. When somebody makes the text,  this writer can make some own worlds.  Here we should say "don't be so serious Sam", then I would write something about Pharaohs, we can say almost everything about those people. I haven't met any Pharaoh in my life, and I must confess, that the use of own imagination we can fill the holes of our knowledge.


Also, Mika Waltari probably didn't meet Akhnaten or doctor Sinuhe in his life. He must use the imagination in his famous book "Sinuhe", that this writer wrote in Istanbul. Here we must think something very interesting things in history, what are connecting to the finding of the grave of Tutankhamun. The man, who was working in the field was Howard Carter, as you probably have read in the schools.  Of course is quite suspicious that Carter found the grave in the last day when the financial support, what this man got from Carvarnor was ending. And here I must ask again "how long the hemp rope would stand in the desert?". Does that material stand 2000 years in the air?


And if Carter was looking for that grave with the theodolite, how this grave could be found? The grave KV-62 is in the canyon, and it was not visible. So were there some texts, where were the place of that remarkable cave? And were somebody visited there before Carter?. When we are thinking about the books of Waltari, they are very interesting. This man was the very sophisticated writer, and he wrote many novels from history to crime. And all his characters were actually fiction. He has used the historical persons with fictional characters, but nobody knows actually, what kind of man was Akhenaten.


The name would not make the character real, and when we are thinking about the position of fictional character Sinuhe in that book that doctor was placed in the highest places in the Egyptian society. And sometimes I have thought, that some writer like Clive Cussler could make the novel, where Sinuhe could move to America by using the reed boat. Or maybe Akhenaten had bad relationships with his family, and they did not send the bounty hunters after this doctor. Who knows what were the ideas of Waltari, when he wrote that character.

About the truth and lies, what is written by poets and historians

Kimmo Huosionmaa

None historian ever told the absolute truth, and the history has been faked from ancient Greece. The reason, why historians told lies about the leaders was practical. If the leaders of the nations didn’t like the texts, what historians wrote, their fate was very painful death in the mouth of emperors pet crocodile or lion. In the real world, the politics have been the ruling element when historians wrote their texts.


When we are observing the familiar books like Julius Caesar’s ” War in Gallic” we must consider, that there are many things, what makes us to suspect that this book is some kind of ”better version” about the things, what claimed to happen, when Julius Caesar was head of the legions in Gallic. I believe that some of those texts are written in some European courts in the medieval period, or they can be made later.


The part of the book, where Caesar tells about the invasion of Britannia is a part, what is not written any master of poems and rhetorics. And when we are looking at the pictures of Dover straight, we must see that the horses are not suitable in that place because the crag is so high. So did somebody made that mistake on purpose? Another part of this column of the text is full of errors, and all story feels like they were in some taverna.


So if the writer made those errors on purpose, we must ask does he lived at the same time as Caesar. In this case, that part of the text has been written for making Caesar suspected as the liar. But if it is written after Caesar’s time, we must consider, that this text might be written in somewhere in Danmark, and it might be portrayed the coast of Sjelland or some other island.


We must say that there is no evidence, that Caesar ever visited north as Danmark. But when we are talking about his book, we must say that even this book is not probably written by Caesar himself. Or part of that book is maybe written by himself, but there might be many columns, what are written after Caesar’s death. And if he hired some professional writers, those persons might make mistakes on purpose, for making Caesar seem like the liar.


Many writers have also been writing false things, because of they afraid that if the emperor doesn’t like them they would be executed. This fate was faced Cicero, the famous Roman poet, and historian. He was killed by Antonius, and his tongue was nailed to the wall. It’s very sad end for great writer and speaker of history. In this case, we must say, that Marcus Antonius was not able to handle critics what he faced as the rank of the emperor.


And if the writings of some persons were not satisfied rulers, those men were executed. Even in the modern era, there are people sitting in jail because they have written something, what was uncomfortable for the rulers. When we are talking about leaders of the nations, they sometimes think, that every problem will be handled by arresting journalists and writers. But when we are thinking about the role of media, we must say that there are cases in history, that reporters start to publish texts, what would protect authoritarian and support censorship.


This is called ”official press”. Some countries like that they have freedom of speech, but only persons who have right to publish their texts are the ”official reporters”. In those countries, the press is in the main role to justify the political police control, and arresting what is targeted for the members of the opposition. So the press could also be a part of the authoritarian government and support the persecution what is targeted to political resistance.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-truth-and-lies-what-is-written-by.html