About futurism and things like interstellar traveling

    .    Spontaneous human combustion (SHC)in the book  "The Bleak House" by Charles Dickens Spontaneous human combustion (SHC) Are all those cases murders, where the identity of the body wanted to destroy? Spontaneous human combustion (SHC) is the hypothetical phenomenon, where the human body would combust without any outer reason. The fact is that in some cases, the SHC was the murder. After killing the victim, the criminal has destroyed the body by using the magnesium stick or scuba diver torch. One of those cases is Mary Reese's case from 1951(1). The thing that people found was her leg and a hole on the floor. If we are thinking about that case as a murder ewe might ask: why somebody wanted to vanish the body of that woman? The fact is that nobody has seen the SHC itself, and that means that every one of those cases might be murder. So in some cases, the heavy drinking victim would just face the fate that somebody has put the potassium sulfate in the bottle of spirit

  .     Can humans be their ancestors themselves? The remaining of the genetic legacy is the main topic in some thrillers, and the thing is that the firms like Cryonics institute are offering services, that persons can store their bodies in liquid nitrogen. Some of them are waiting for waking up when the technology is advanced so much, that their illnesses can cure. But things like genomes can also store in cryogenic conditions. The genomes can store in the form of cells, and the things like embryos can store in liquid nitrogen for a very long time. And that thing causes a question, can a human be themselves their ancestors? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The answer is simple: there are two main ways which makes that thing possible even if there are no time machines: 1) The person would wake up from the cryogenic ice after a couple of generations and then marries their descendant. 1B) The person can be stored in the form of an embr

     . Image I Cognito Ergo Sum II Cognito Ergo Sum "I think I am," said René Descartes, and the question is does the thinking mean that person or creature exists. So when we are thinking that only aware creatures can think we must realize that there is a question what makes this Descartes quote one of the most interesting topics in history. That question is that would the creature need the ability to think that it exists? If we are thinking about things like stones they exist. We can test that thing by kicking the stone without a shoe, and that thing proves that thing exists. So does the ability to react to some kind of things like yelling by saying, "are you all right" mean that the creature understands the meaning of the words? The artificially intelligent robot can emulate feelings by looking at certain marks from the face of a human. When the volume of the speech rises very high that robot can say "please low down your noise". Or if a person seems to