This makes machines so terrible in the military purpose

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/this-makes-machines-so-terrible-in.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

After this text is one short film, what crystallizes the reason, why robots are so terrifying military machines. What makes robots so fascinating soldiers, is that they follow always the orders. Robots would not think the same way as we do, and their thinking bases the linear programming. The term "linear programming" means that the robot would follow the program if there would not be interrupts. In some scenarios, the superpowers would start together and then they would send the robot spacecraft to the far away beyond the Kuiper belt. Those robot spacecraft missions would make the attack against the enemy by using some "doomsday" weapon, in the case, where the own side would be destroyed.

This scenario is straight from the hypothesis, that there would be patrolling the robot submarines at the sea, what are ready to shoot their missiles if they get orders to use their nuclear missiles or the signal to command base would be cut. This scenario is very terrifying because nobody hasn't thought the scene, where the communication between the base and robot vehicle would be cut by reason of technical problems in the probe. In this scenario, the central computer of the probe would start the attack against the predicted enemy.

Even the conflict has been ended, those robot drones continue their mission, and that makes them so terrifying weapon. Those drones would send to Kuiper belt, and then they would be in there for waiting orders, and there would not be corrosion in that distance from the Sun. Then the "everything Ok" signal would be cut, and the probe will start to operate. When we are thinking about the techniques, what those fictional probes I hope, would be used, could be very terrifying and advanced.

They might be equipped with Von Neumann-factories, what can build the repair parts for the probe, and the same factories would be used to make ammunition for the rail guns of that machine. But in the worst scenario those probes could make copies of themselves, and even we have sent one of those intelligent probes to Universum, we might face the situation, where there would be thousands of those military probes. I hope that this writing is only fiction, and this program is only in my head.

But who knows, what military leaders in the Moscow and Washington think? This kind of drones would be the replacer for nuclear missiles, but if they would equip with rail guns, what would accelerate the speed of ammunition near the speed of light, could those systems destroy even the planet. The kinetic energy in those high power railguns would be so devastating, that the Earth will face same fate with planet Mars. And that's why this kind of technology will be devastating in the wrong hands.

The film I mentioned

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjJmTeBSEzU

Picture I

https://img.purch.com/w/660/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zcGFjZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAwOS84MTgvb3JpZ2luYWwvbmFzYS1kZWVwLXNwYWNlLXZlaGljbGUtbXBjdi1hcnQuanBn

Use virtual "perpetual motion machines" and seawater as energy sources.

Use virtual "perpetual motion machines" and seawater as energy sources. The Archimedean screw can offer almost endless energy sources. "Robert Fludd's 1618 "water screw" perpetual motion machine from a 1660 wood engraving. It is widely credited as the first attempt to describe such a device." (Wikipedia/Perpetual motion) The term "virtual perpetual motion machine" means a machine. That pulls water to the upper tank using a capillary tube. Then that water will fall through the generator or turbine wheel. The machine uses differences in pressure levels. But it looks like a "perpetual motion machine", that is impossible because of laws of thermodynamics. The machine uses differences in pressure levels. But it looks like a " real perpetual motion machine", which is impossible because of the laws of thermodynamics. The real perpetual motion machines don't use outside energy. And that's why they are not possible.

Metamaterials can change their properties in an electric- or electro-optical field.

"Researchers have created a novel metamaterial that can dynamically tune its shape and properties in real-time, offering unprecedented adaptability for applications in robotics and smart materials. This development bridges the gap between current materials and the adaptability seen in nature, paving the way for the future of adaptive technologies. Credit: UNIST" (ScitechDaily, Metamaterial Magic: Scientists Develop New Material That Can Dynamically Tune Its Shape and Mechanical Properties in Real-Time) Metamaterials can change their properties in an electric- or electro-optical field. An electro-optical activator can also be an IR state, which means. The metamorphosis in the material can thermally activate. AI is the ultimate tool for metamaterial research. Metamaterials are nanotechnical- or quantum technical tools that can change their properties, like reflection or state from solid to liquid when the electric or optical effect hits that material. The metamaterial can cru

There might be an answer to why there is a gravitational hole in Earth's gravitational field.

The gravitational field at the point of the Indian Ocean is weaker than in other places on Earth. The existence of that gravitational hole is proved. But the reason why that gravitational hole is formed is unknown. The reason why the gravitational field on the Indian Ocean is weaker might be a simple thing. There is a possible lighter rock in the mantle, or there is less material at that point. In some wildest theories, there are bubbles in magma that turn below the bottom of the Indian Ocean are less massive than in other places on Earth. The lighter material at that point should make the hole in gravitation. "Geoid undulation in false color. (International Centre for Global Earth Models/Wikimedia, CC BY 4.0) The impact of the ancient planet. In the time when Earth was young. Cause asymmetry of Earth's gravitational field, because there still is the debris of that impact. But the hole in a gravitational field is harder to explain than regular-looking asymmetry. Could the r

About futurism and things like interstellar traveling

Search This Blog